Laserfiche WebLink
<br />priorities workshop. She stated that she would support the motion, but cautioned <br />everyone to take his or her time. <br /> <br />The roll call vote was as follows: <br />AYES: Councilmembers - Ayala, Brozosky, Campbell, Hosterman, and <br />Mayor Pico <br />None <br />None <br />None <br /> <br />NOES: <br />ABSENT: <br />ABSTAIN: <br /> <br />There was a break at 9:35 p.m. <br /> <br />The meeting reconvened at 9:43 p.m. <br /> <br />Mayor Pico was excused from the remainder of the meeting. Vice Mayor Ayala <br />conducted the remainder of the meeting. <br /> <br />Item 6d <br />Review of Traffic Meterinl!: at the Intersection of Vinevard A venue and Rubv Hill <br />Drive (SR 04:015) <br /> <br />Mr. Brozosky noted that he owned property in the Vineyard A venuelRuby Hill <br />area, and wanted to make sure he could be involved in the discussion. <br /> <br />Mr. Roush indicated that Mr. Brozosky could participate in the discussion. <br /> <br />Jeff Knowles presented the staff report. <br /> <br />Ms. Hosterman indicated her desire to continue metering traffic coming into <br />town. She wanted Council to reach a point where it had the opportunity to collect as <br />much data as possible in order to know whether metering is working. Over the past four <br />weeks, she has been traveling on Vineyard Avenue at all times of the day and night. She <br />believed there are appropriate times for metering and there are other times that metering <br />did not seem appropriate, for example, at eight or nine in the evening. If the metering <br />continues to be kept in place, she suggested narrowing the time of the metering to peak <br />traffic times so as not hinder or slow down traffic that is within Pleasanton during non- <br />peak traffic hours. <br /> <br />Mr. Knowles noted that this could be done, but pointed out that metering of traffic <br />is policy related. He reported that regional cut-through traffic on Vineyard Avenue did <br />not begin until Route 84 became congested. He noted that Vineyard Avenue could be <br />designed to carry as much traffic as Council wanted it to, or traffic could be shifted and <br />routed to Stanley Boulevard. His interpretation of Council's previous action was to shift <br />as much traffic to Stanley Boulevard as possible, which is what staff implernented, Staff <br />could meter traffic strictly in the morning when three cars per green light are allowed into <br />town. Staff could only stop and delay traffic from 3 p.m, to 6:30 p.m. He believed the <br /> <br />Pleasanton City Council <br />Minutes <br /> <br />21 <br /> <br />01/20/04 <br />