My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CCMIN012004
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
MINUTES
>
2000-2009
>
2004
>
CCMIN012004
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/17/2007 10:56:38 AM
Creation date
1/15/2004 11:49:12 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
1/20/2004
DOCUMENT NO
CCMIN012004
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
32
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />current metering schedule was successful because it allowed the City to work on creating <br />an impression that Vineyard Av=ue is not the way to go. <br /> <br />Mr. Brozosky noted that he lives in the Vineyard Avenue Corridor and he uses <br />this route to get to Route 84 without having to cut through Pleasanton to get to Interstate <br />680. <br /> <br />In trying to minimize the impacts to the local residents, Mr. Knowles believed it <br />was a trade-off to have a 15 second stop in the battle against "cut-through traffic." The <br />question then becomes "is it unreasonable?" He noted that staff will try different <br />approaches to achieve a consensus of community feeling, and will modify approaches if <br />necessary. He mentioned that metering of traffic signals is flexible, but pointed out that <br />if metering is reduced, there would be a natural increase in traffic. <br /> <br />Mr. Brozosky believed it was easy to argue that a IS-second delay at 2 a.m, would <br />not discourage anyone, and in fact, might compel motorists to run a red light, which as a <br />result creates an unsafe intersection. He also believed it was unsafe for someone to be <br />stopped for 15 to 20 seconds in a dark, rural area, He believed the direction given to staff <br />at a previous Council meeting was to meter only the intersection of Vineyard Avenue and <br />Ruby Hill Drive in the morning and not the remainder of the day. <br /> <br />If Council chose to provide direction to staff to continue metering at the <br />intersection of Vineyard Avenue and Ruby Hill Drive, Ms. Ayala asked what morning <br />hours would be recommended. <br /> <br />Mr. Knowles indicated that the most severe metering would need to occur <br />between the hours of 7: 15 a.m. to 8: 15 a.m., to minimize the backup of traffic occurring <br />at Montevino Drive. <br /> <br />Ms, Ayala believed the afternoon traffic metering should occur between the hours <br />of 3 p,m. to 6:30 p.m. <br /> <br />Mr. Knowles indicated that he would recommend starting the afternoon metering <br />immediately after school gets out, which would be from 3:30 p.m. to 6:30 p.m. He noted <br />that this would not be strict traffic metering, and it would only stop and delay drivers. <br /> <br />Mr. Brozosky asked if it would be possible to program the traffic lights from 7: 15 <br />a.m. to 8:15 a.m. and from 3:30 p,m. to 6:30 p.m. on the weekdays for westbound traffic, <br />and for all other times rest the traffic signal in green, or configure the signal to turn <br />immediately to green so that drivers are not sitting there waiting. <br /> <br />Mr. Knowles recommended that the signal be programmed to rest in green. Staff <br />did not want drivers to assume that as they approach a red light it would change. <br /> <br />Mr, Campbell asked if staff believed the metering hours of7:15 a.m. to 8:15 a,m. <br />were sufficient? <br /> <br />Pleasanton City Council <br />Minutes <br /> <br />22 <br /> <br />01/20/04 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.