Laserfiche WebLink
A feature of the plan which was overlooked w}~reri it w~zs initially <br />submitted is that the two warehouse buildings come to within 5 ft. <br />of the rear property lines of the subject site. `1']ie subject property, <br />although it is zoned PUD, is subject to the site development standards <br />of the C-S District and a minimum 10 ft. rear yard setback is required <br />in that district. The buildings therefore, would need to either be <br />moved forward 5 ft. or a variance requested for their retention in <br />their present locations. The applicant has chosen t}~e latter tack <br />and has filed a variance for the rear yard encroachrlc_nt=. This will <br />be }reard by the F3oard of Adjustment at their 2/22/£34 meeting. . <br />A negative dc~r_laration accompanies this report. I3asc~d on the Initial <br />Environmental Study done for this project it is tlir~ sniff's opinion <br />that case 7.-84-39 would not have any significant arlvc~rse effects <br />on the environment. If your Board concurs wit}i this environmental <br />assessment you must make the findi.nc~ that the necJtiLi.vc declaration <br />is appropriates Cor the project. '1'}ie finding mush lie ruiae prior to <br />taking action on t}ie project itself. <br />Staff Recommendation: T}ie staff feels that t}~e proposed project <br />would be appropriate for the area in which it would be located. <br />For this reason, we recommend approval of case Z-84-;~9 subject <br />to all conditions on the following pages: <br />