Laserfiche WebLink
<br />P. The parties desire to enter into this Agreement for all of the purposes set forth herein <br /> <br />below. <br /> <br />Q. Livermore, County and Pleasanton conducted appropriate environmental review under <br />the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") for their execution of this Agreement. <br /> <br />R. The Livermore City Council, by adoption of Resolution 2007..;148, dated July 9, 2007, <br />approved and authorized the execution of this Agreement by Livermore. <br /> <br />S. The Pleasanton City Council, by adoption of Resolution 07-149, dated September 18, <br />2007, approved and authorized the execution of this Agreement by Pleasanton. <br /> <br />T. The Alameda County Board of Supervisors, by adoption of Resolution R2007-369, dated <br />July 31, 2007, approved and authorized the execution ofthis Agreement by County. <br /> <br />u. The Alameda County Board of Supervisors, sitting as Authority, by adoption of <br />Resolution R-2007-437, dated July 31, 2007, approved and authorized the execution ofthis Agreement by <br />Authority. <br /> <br />NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and the mutual covenants and obligations <br />set forth in this Agreement, the parties hereby agree as follows: <br /> <br />AGREEMENT <br /> <br />1. PURPOSES OF TmS AGREEMENT. The parties each acknowledge, agree and find <br />that the primary purposes of this Agreement include providing mechanisms: (a) to help effectuate the <br />portion of the Current Livermore Projects, as set forth in the Livermore EIR, that requires Livermore's <br />consultation and cooperation with Pleasanton, County and Vulcan on the development of necessary traffic <br />improvements and related infrastructure; (b) to help address Vulcan's concerns regarding potential traffic <br />circulation and safety impacts of the Livermore Projects and the Staples Ranch Project and, subject to the <br />provisions of this Agreement, to allow the Projects to proceed notwithstanding such concerns and <br />Vulcan's further concerns regarding potential impacts of the Projects on its costs of transportation and <br />operation; (c) to assure the construction of the Improvements, as mandatory obligations of the <br />Jurisdictions if any of the Projects are developed, in accordance with the provisions of this Agreement; <br />and (d) to further evidence Vulcan's satisfaction of certain conditions of Vulcan's SMP related to the <br />Improvements. <br /> <br />2. DEFINITIONS. In addition to the terms defined in the Recitals above or elsewhere in <br />this Agreement, the following terms used herein shall have the following meanings: <br /> <br />2.2 "Claims" shall mean claims, demands, actions, causes of action, liabilities, <br />damages, losses, costs and expenses, of any nature whatsoever, including attorneys', experts' and <br />consultants' fees and costs. <br /> <br />2.3 "Constructing Jurisdiction" shall mean the Jurisdiction which is obligated to <br />construct the EI Charro imd Intersection Improvements pursuant to this Agreement, as determined <br />pursuant to Section 3.1 hereof. <br /> <br />2.4 "Construction Management Plan" shall mean a plan prepared by or on behalf of <br />the appropriate Jurisdiction governing the construction of the EI Charro and Intersection Improvements, <br />the Livermore Additional Improvements, or the Pleasanton Additional Improvements, as the case may be, <br /> <br />002483.0004\793691.13 <br /> <br />4 <br />