My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
15 ATTACHMENT 9
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2008
>
031808
>
15 ATTACHMENT 9
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/2/2008 1:56:39 PM
Creation date
3/14/2008 4:54:38 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
3/18/2008
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
15 ATTACHMENT 9
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
380
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
though, they ask me to do their offices and other things, but really, I just do custom <br />homes, and most of the work that I do are estate homes. <br />So, I prepared a footprint for Brian and Greg, a site plan, and one exterior elevation. And <br />that exterior elevation is the one that is seen as they come up the driveway and see the <br />house, not from down below. The initial designs are basically what you see today. We <br />were exceeding the 25-foot at that point, in 2001. We had a small portion of the house <br />that we wanted -two stories - and by doing so, it really allowed us several things. We <br />were actually 21/z feet over. Right now, we're a little over three feet over the 25-foot <br />limit. However, we've discussed that, and I know we can be back to the 2%Z feet over the <br />25-foot level. But by going two stories, we do several things. We eliminate a lot more <br />area on the pad; we have less area to make a pad; and we also get a variety of roofs. As <br />Donna has pointed out, the articulation of the roofs was very important to us to establish <br />the style of the house. <br />In fact, the ridge that you see that's just below the cupola, it is over 28 feet above the <br />main floor, and it only consumes a little less than three percent of the entire roof of the <br />house, so it is not much. But that does not include the cupola. <br />Brian's comments to the site plan, the siting of the house, the floor plan, and the <br />_ elevations were asfollows - he felt that he had no problem with the 2%2 feet so we <br />continued with that. He felt that the 27% feet that we were proposing could not be . <br />- visually distinguished from below, and he liked the difference in the articulation of•the <br />roofs, and that was part of the elements of the house. <br />He did suggest one major thing that we did; we moved the house farther from the pad <br />edge, which is where the old house is; so that visually, it would not be seen as much: So <br />• we have moved the house back. His other comments were minor. He wanted us to revise <br />the access off of Vineyard Avenue, and he wanted us to work with the Fire Department to <br />see if we could use the old road, and just have a 20=foot right-of--way. And since then, <br />RJA, the civil engineers, have worked with the Fire Department, and we have done that. <br />We have changed the access off of Vineyard Avenue. <br />Remember, it was at the beginning of 2002 that we did all this work. Shortly after that <br />meeting, Greg Plucker called me and asked if we could look at some other solutions for <br />siting. He asked if we could do two of them. One was directly above the old house and <br />work our way up the hill; the other one would have been to the north, which is toward the <br />Reznick and Roberts house, to stair-step the house that way. <br />So, we did some block studies for them, and it was evident that it was going to more <br />visual from below. First of all, we would have been taking out the majority of the trees <br />that are above the old house, and the house would be far more visual. Going the other <br />direction would have done the same thing - it would have been far more visual to the <br />Reznicks and the Roberts house. There was one other reason that we decided not to take <br />those solutions, and that was that the owner felt that they would have to be driving in to <br />their estate home at the garage level, and then going up to the house. And that was not <br />7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.