My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
15 ATTACHMENT 9
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2008
>
031808
>
15 ATTACHMENT 9
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/2/2008 1:56:39 PM
Creation date
3/14/2008 4:54:38 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
3/18/2008
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
15 ATTACHMENT 9
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
380
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Site and Grading Plans <br />1. Land Use Objective 7 (p. 16) -Preserve the major ridgeline. in the southern Plan Area, limit <br />development of hilltop areas to homes that can be substantially screened from off-site areas, <br />and limit hillside development to areas that can physically and visually accommodate it <br />without disrupting the natural character of the site. <br />A portion of the existing ridgeline would not be preserved, as it would be cut up to 40 feet deep <br />to construct a large flat pad for the residence. Although grading down the existing ridgeline <br />would help reduce views of the residence (compared to placing the house on the existing grades <br />on top of the ridge), it would place the house near the top of the property (625 ft. elevation), <br />which would make it more prominent than if the house were located downslope and within the <br />flat bench created for the existing residence, guest house, and garage (existing pad elevations of <br />596-599 feet). Furthermore, the proposed residence would be a very large structure (13,165 <br />square feet), would exceed the height and story limits, and would require the removal of <br />approximately 62 trees. The existing trees to remain are predominantly deciduous blue oak <br />trees, which would provide little screening when the leaves are not on the trees. Even if large <br />numbers of evergreen screen trees were planted around the residence and accessory structures, <br />it would take many years to substantially screen the residence and accessory structures from off <br />site views. <br />2. Land Use Objective 8 (p. 17) -Ensure that future development of the hilly areas located <br />south of Vineyard Avenue is designed to emphasize the rural character through careful siting <br />of buildings, minimal disruption to the physical terrain, and sensitive architectural and <br />landscape treatments. <br />See comments for item #1 above. <br />3. Physical Planning Concept (p. 17) -The land use plan is intended to facilitate a smooth <br />transition between the urban edge of Pleasanton to the west and the Ruby Hill development <br />to the east. The design concept requires environmentally-sensitive site planning and design <br />of development in the hillside areas south of Vineyard Avenue and the integration of <br />vineyards with other land uses north of Vineyard Avenue, organized to create a functional <br />and attractive visual entry to the Livermore Valley wine country. <br />The proposal does not appear to be environmentally sensitive since approximately 62 existing <br />trees, mostly native blue oaks, would be removed (16 heritage sized and many near heritage <br />sized), disrupting the existing oak woodland. Furthermore, a substantial amount of grading is <br />required to create the flat pad at the top of the ridgeline. <br />4. Physical Planning Concept (p. 17) -Residential development in Subarea 3 is to be sited so as <br />to preserve significant natural features such as major ridgelines and hilltop areas, woodland, <br />PUD-32 Page - S - June 8, 2005 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.