Laserfiche WebLink
Chair Blank inquired if he received a copy of the CC&R's when he purchased his <br />home. Mr. Jeffrey replied that he was not aware of that. <br />Commissioner Fox asked Mr. Jeffrey if his contractor did not know about the <br />CC&R's when he pulled the permits. Mr. Jeffrey replied that he had a licensed <br />contractor but that his first knowledge of the CC&R's was when Mr. Wickboldt <br />showed up at his home and told him there were issues with his work. He added that <br />Mr. Wickboldt asked him to "hold tight" and they would try to resolve the problem. <br />He stated that he asked Mr. Wickboldt for a copy of the CC&R's, which <br />Mr. Wickboldt dropped off at his doorstep two days later. <br />In response to Commissioner Narum's question regarding the distance from the <br />fence line to the wall, Mr. Jeffrey replied that the distance between the property line <br />and the wall is 15 feet, which is the mandatory easement. Commissioner Narum <br />stated that she thought the wall had been moved in from where the original fence <br />had been, and Mr. Jeffrey replied that the original fence was probably a foot higher <br />than the base of the retaining wall. Ms. Amos verified that a Building Inspector had <br />measured the distance and indicated that the existing redwood fence then was <br />about seven to eight feet from the property line; the applicant had moved the fence <br />back to maintain the 15-foot easement required in that area. <br />Commissioner Narum inquired if the landscaping in the backyard was complete. <br />Mr. Jeffrey replied that more landscaping was proposed, but he did not have <br />additional money to spend at this time. He indicated that the intent is that in <br />approximately one year, the plantings there will grow in. He stated that he had <br />switched a lot of the vegetation from his original plan listed in Exhibit A to these <br />different fast-growing varieties of shrubs and trees in order to meet the neighbors' <br />needs as well as his own. He added that it is not his intent to just do what he wants <br />and ignore his neighbors or staff. <br />Commissioner O'Connor requested confirmation from staff that Mr. Iserson's <br />direction to Mr. Jeffrey in January 2008 that he could proceed included both the pool <br />and the retaining wall. Ms. Amos confirmed that was correct. She added that the <br />applicant went ahead with the pool and did not work on the retaining wall until later <br />in the year. She reiterated that no permit is required for afour-foot tall retaining wall <br />but that Mr. Jeffrey did receive one from the Building and Safety Division. <br />Commissioner O'Connor noted that one letter asking Mr. Jeffrey to stop work was <br />dated August 8, 2008 and asked Mr. Jeffrey if he received that letter. Mr. Jeffrey <br />confirmed that he did receive it but that he understood from his conversations with <br />Ms. Amos and Mr. Dolan that this was not an order to stop work but a notice that if <br />he did move forward, he would be responsible for possibly removing what had been <br />installed should the final resolution be different from what he had installed. <br />Ms. Amos confirmed that whether the work involved installing landscaping or <br />grading, the applicant, should he choose to move forward after receiving a work <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, September 10, 2008 Page 18 of 33 <br />