My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 091008
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2000-2009
>
2008
>
PC 091008
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/5/2017 4:38:03 PM
Creation date
11/26/2008 1:14:53 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
9/10/2008
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NAME
PC 091008
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
33
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
24-hour cooling-off period for over-the-counter approvals, particularly when they <br />involve children. <br />Commissioner Fox noted that things are sometimes streamlined so quickly that it <br />appears applications are being rubber-stamped. He stated that whenever these <br />things occur, they have involved the inability to immediately access a record or <br />condition that should be on a computer system somewhere. He added that the <br />Commission has seen numerous walls that have been constructed that do not <br />comply with the egress requirements as well as issues regarding athree- to <br />four-story senior care facility which seem to go back to what types of Planning <br />records are available to both the public and the Planners on duty. She noted that <br />there have been a number of mistaken approvals lately and that the focus on <br />streamlining should consider slowing down the pace to avoid mistakes. <br />Commissioner Narum agreed that there should be safeguards put in place so these <br />kinds of errors no longer happen. <br />Commissioner Fox noted that the Commission's approval of tutoring and other <br />schools to be a permitted use has resulted in ramifications that might make the <br />Commission wish to re-think its decision and make it a conditional use again. She <br />added that the Commission also needs to look at the context of some of the zoning <br />decisions it has made for permitted uses that do not require a conditional use permit, <br />such that applicants are coming in as tutoring facilities when they are actually day <br />care facilities. She indicated that the Commission needs to re-evaluate and <br />determine whether or not the Commission made the right decision, re-visit them, and <br />revert them to conditional uses. <br />Chair Blank noted that this is a completely different issue than permits at the counter <br />and suggested separating the issues. <br />Commissioner Fox stated that she felt they were related because some of these <br />permitted uses are getting grubber-stamp at the counter. <br />Chair Blank noted that these are not errors made by staff and they are following <br />exactly what the Commission has asked them to do. <br />Commissioner Pearce stated that the Commissioners agree that this needs to be <br />discussed. She added that she thinks the Commission is talking about which <br />process is most important. She asked Mr. Dolan what his recommendation is with <br />respect to streamlining. <br />Mr. Dolan acknowledged that there have been mistakes and that staff is not happy <br />with them either. He added that staff wants to do whatever it can to eliminate <br />mistakes. He indicated that he likes Chair Blank's approach that he suggest some <br />ideas on how staff can address this issue. He noted that some of them relate to a <br />technology question, which cannot be fixed overnight, and others have to do with <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, September 10, 2008 Page 31 of 33 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.