My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
09 ATTACHMENTS
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2009
>
021709
>
09 ATTACHMENTS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/5/2009 1:21:44 PM
Creation date
2/12/2009 4:35:29 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
2/17/2009
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
09 ATTACHMENTS
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
314
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
3.3.3 Impacts to Burrowing Owls <br />Potential Impacts. While a protocol level survey was not conducted for burrowing owls, no <br />owls or indirect burrowing owl evidence was observed on the site during the Februazy and April, <br />2008, reconnaissance surveys, both of which were conducted during the breeding season, and <br />both were conducted at a sufficient level to have noted owls if there were onsite. Furthermore, <br />there have been no sightings of the species within three miles of the site in the last fifteen years. <br />However, burrowing owls aze a volant species, and given the presence of potentially suitable <br />burrows, an individual could overwinter on the site, though this would be unlikely due to the <br />site's management regime. If a burrowing owl were to occur on the site in the future prior to <br />development, such project-related activities could result in direct mortality to these birds. <br />Construction activities that result in mortality of individual owls constitute a violation of state <br />and federal laws (see Section 3.2.3) and would be considered a significant impact under CEQA. <br />Mitigation. No mitigation is warranted for loss of breeding habitat for the burrowing owl. To <br />avoid impacts to burrowing owls (should they occur on site at sometime in the future before the <br />beginning of construction), a qualified biologist should conduct pre-construction surveys for <br />owls within 30 days of the onset of ground disturbance. These surveys would be conducted in a <br />manner consistent with accepted burrowing owl survey protocols. If pre-construction surveys <br />determine that burrowing owls occupy the site during the non-breeding season (September 1 <br />through January 31), then an eviction effort (i.e., blocking burrows with one-way doors and <br />leaving them in place for a minimum of three days) maybe necessary to ensure that the owls are <br />not banned or injured during construction. Should burrowing owls be detected on the site or <br />immediately adjacent lands (i.e., within 250 feet of the site boundary) during future breeding <br />seasons (February 1 through August 31), a construction-free buffer of at least 250 feet should be <br />established azound all active owl nests. The buffer areas should be enclosed with temporary <br />fencing, and construction equipment and workers should not enter the enclosed setback azeas. <br />Buffers should remain in place for the duration of the breeding season or until young aze <br />independent. After the breeding season, an eviction process for any remaining owls may take <br />place as described above. <br />Ironwood 55+ Biotic Evaluation Live Oak Associates, Inc. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.