My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
09 ATTACHMENTS
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2009
>
021709
>
09 ATTACHMENTS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/5/2009 1:21:44 PM
Creation date
2/12/2009 4:35:29 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
2/17/2009
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
09 ATTACHMENTS
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
314
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
C CORNERSTONE <br />EARTH GROUP <br />slope would likely be adequate if the slope were graded to a consistent 2:1 slope inclination. <br />This would eliminate over-steepened portions of the slope and reportedly increase long-term <br />slope instability. Their conclusion regarding the stability of the southwestern slope was based <br />on data contained in two other reports (Miller Pacific, 2004 and Treadwell & Rollo, 2007). <br />In addition, a geotechnical investigation was performed by TRC (formerly Lowney Associates) <br />for the adjacent Ironwood residential development and summarized in a report dated June 11, <br />2002. The results contained in this report were used to develop grading, foundation and <br />pavement recommendations for the recently completed Ironwood development. <br />1.2 SCOPE OF SERVICES <br />Our scope of services was presented in our proposal dated December 20, 2007, and consisted <br />of field and laboratory programs to evaluate physical and engineering properties of the <br />subsurface soils, engineering analysis to prepare recommendations for site work and grading, <br />building foundations, flatwork, retaining walls, and pavements, and preparation of this report. <br />Brief descriptions of our exploration and laboratory programs are presented below. <br />1.3 EXPLORATION PROGRAM <br />Field exploration consisted of six borings drilled on December 19, 2007, with truck-mounted <br />hollow-stem auger drilling equipment. The borings were drilled to depths of approximately 20 to <br />(" 40 feet. The approximate locations of the boring drills for this investigation, as well as those <br />\. drilled for previous investigation, are shown on the Site Plan, Figure 2. <br />The borings were backfilled with in accordance with local requirements; exploration permits <br />were obtained as required by local jurisdictions. Details regarding our field program are <br />included in Appendix A. <br />1.4 LABORATORY TESTING PROGRAM <br />In addition to visual classification of samples, the laboratory program focused on obtaining data <br />for foundation design and seismic ground deformation estimates. Testing included moisture <br />contents (ASTM D2216), dry densities (ASTM D2937), grain size analyses (ASTM D 422), <br />washed sieve analyses (ASTM D1140), Plasticity Index tests (ASTM D4318), percent collapse <br />(ASTM D5333), and unconsolidated-undrained triaxial strength (ASTM DD2850) tests. Details <br />regarding our laboratory program are included in Appendix B. <br />1.5 CORROSION EVALUATION <br />Preliminary soil corrosion tests were also performed on six soil samples collected at depths <br />ranging from 2'/z to 9 feet. These tests included pH (ASTM G51), sulfate (Caltrans 417), <br />chloride (Caltrans 422), and resistivity at 100 percent saturation (ASTM G57). The results of <br />these tests, as well as a brief discussion of the soil corrosion potential prepared by JDH <br />Corrosion Consultants, are presented in Appendix C. <br />Ponderosa Active Adult Community Page 2 <br />132-2-1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.