Laserfiche WebLink
this was so. Mr. Tassano added that the one which has been in the traffic plan for the <br />last ten years and in the General Plan for the last 12 years is the triple southbound left <br />turn. He noted that the City moved forward with that project, had the design level <br />complete, and is currently working on the funding portion. He added that the City did <br />not have sufficient funds at that time and held off on it for awhile, adjusted some of the <br />design elements, and returned to the Council a couple of years ago. He noted that the <br />Council was not comfortable with a triple southbound left turn, as were the residents in <br />the area, due to concerns over pedestrian safety and the width of the crossing. He <br />continued that he was then asked to look at other potential solutions and to determine if <br />extending Stoneridge Drive would be a possible mitigation to this LOS. He stated that <br />what was determined was that right now, Stoneridge Drive extension would mostly add <br />some cross-town traffic to get back on the freeway at EI Charro Road. He added that in <br />the future, at build-out, there would be a higher need in the Hacienda Business Park <br />area, and extending Stoneridge Drive would have more benefits as it will alleviate more <br />traffic seen at Santa Rita Road and Valley Avenue. He stated that the Council is now <br />faced with a dilemma of not favoring the triple southbound left turn as a near-term <br />mitigation, with the knowledge that alonger-term mitigation in the future would be the <br />Stoneridge Drive extension. He noted that the question to be answered after the <br />General Plan is completed is the timeline on when the cross-town traffic would diminish <br />to a point where there would be a greater benefit of the local need to reduce the <br />southbound left-turn volume. <br />In response to Commissioner Narum's inquiry regarding when this might occur, <br />Mr. Tassano replied that he would be able to analyze this in greater detail after the <br />completion of the General Plan. <br />Commissioner Narum noted that it would be years away if and when the Stoneridge <br />Drive extension occurs and inquired if there were other solutions that could alleviate this <br />intersection besides the triple southbound left turn. Mr. Tassano replied that he did not <br />know if and when Stoneridge Drive would be extended and that nothing else is planned <br />at the present time. She inquired if there is money available if the triple southbound left <br />turn were to be constructed at this time. Mr. Tassano replied that money would be <br />available but that other pipeline projects would need to be shifted around. <br />Commissioner O'Connor voiced concern that while there is money in the bank and the <br />City is waiting to collect more, the costs are rising, and the City is then always behind <br />the 8-ball. Mr. Tassano agreed. <br />In response to the East Side Specific Plan question, Mr. Tassano stated that with the <br />General Plan, there is a combination of residential, retail, and office for the East Side <br />Specific Plan. He added that upon completion of the General Plan, the East Side <br />Specific Plan would give a more specific identification of what that land use is going to <br />be. <br />Commissioner Fox noted that after the Home Depot project was denied, the Council <br />wanted to hold off on development on the East Side until the East Side Specific Plan <br />EXCERPTS: PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, July 9, 2008 Page 15 of 20 <br />