My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
09 ATTACHMENTS
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2009
>
021709
>
09 ATTACHMENTS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/5/2009 1:21:44 PM
Creation date
2/12/2009 4:35:29 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
2/17/2009
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
09 ATTACHMENTS
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
314
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Page 3 of 3 <br />~ ~ i .-. <br />to age 55? <br />a. When the council approved this for senior housing or a school, what age was assumed? <br />b. I recommend if this project is approved that the same age limit of 65 be used to support what I <br />believe was the intent of this area. <br />3) What happens when one of these homes is resold and what provisions guarantee that the new buyers <br />will also be the specified senior age? Who oversees and audits this? <br />4) The city web site did not have the traffic report study referenced? Can this be made available? What is <br />the impact on StanleyNalley? <br />5) What is the route that construction traffic will take? Given Santa Rita and Valley are not supposed to <br />have large trucks, I would like to see written stipulation with fines if not followed, and oversight to insure <br />construction traffic be required to take Stanley to Busch (and not be allowed to take Busch/Santa <br />RitaNalley. <br />Thank you for helping to clarify these items. <br />Nancy Allen <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.