Laserfiche WebLink
The project site is at the terminus of recently developed residential areas of the City. The <br />curving streets and short culs-de-sac minimize monotony and the appearance of mass. <br />New street and open space landscaping is also proposed. <br />Therefore, staff feels that this PUD finding can be made. <br />6. Whether adequate public safety measures have been incorporated into the design of <br />the plan: <br />The streets, gated entry, and EVA connections of the proposed development are <br />satisfactory and can be negotiated by fire and other emergency vehicles. The new homes <br />would be equipped with automatic residential fire sprinklers. The homes would be <br />required to meet the requirements of the Uniform Building Code, Fire Code, other <br />applicable City codes, and State of California energy and accessibility requirements. <br />Therefore, staff believes that this finding can be made. <br />7. Whether the plan conforms to the purposes of the PUD District: <br />The proposed PUD development plan conforms to the purposes of the PUD district. One <br />of these purposes is to insure that the desires of the developer and the community are <br />understood and approved prior to commencement of construction. Staff believes that the <br />proposed project implements the purposes of the PUD ordinance in this case by providing <br />a medium-density senior housing project that is well-designed and sited on the subject <br />property, that fulfills the desires of the applicant, and that meets the City's General Plan <br />goals and policies, including those promoting special-housing needs of the elderly. <br />Moreover, input from the adjacent property owners and tenants has been sought and <br />obtained through a Planning Commission workshop; further opportunity for public <br />comment will occur at the Planning Commission and City Council hearings. <br />Staff feels that through the PUD process the proposed project has provided the developer <br />and the City with a development plan that optimizes the use of this site in a sensitive <br />manner. Therefore, staff believes that this finding can be made. <br />VI. PUBLIC COMMENT <br />Public notices were sent to all property owners and tenants within a 1,000-foot radius of the <br />entire Ironwood development, including the project site. The applicant indicated that she also <br />had met with the Ironwood residents to discuss the proposed project. As noted above, staff had <br />received an email and letter from two residents in the Ironwood development during the <br />workshop review. At the time this report was written, staff has not received any additional <br />comments or concerns from any of the adjacent owners or tenants. <br />PUD-74 Page -19 - June 25, 2008 <br />