Laserfiche WebLink
Sonia Gupta stated that when she went back to work, she wanted a good quality <br />after-school program for her son and was very impressed with Ivy League's <br />programs. She noted that he gets good grades, completes his homework, <br />participates in swimming, and can focus on activities other than academics. She <br />said that after seven months, her son is now speaking Chinese to his friends, is <br />multi-lingual, and is extremely proud of the school. She expressed her support for <br />the school's move to a bigger facility and asked the Commission to approve the <br />proposal. <br />THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED. <br />Chair Blank called for aten-minute break at 9:00 p.m. and thereafter reconvened the <br />regular meeting. <br />Chair Blank thanked all those who provided testimony and indicated that staff has <br />done additional research during the break regarding the previous history and would <br />provide further explanation. <br />Ms. Decker corrected an earlier error that PCUP-179 is the use permit for the <br />Korean Presbyterian Church, which is not affiliated with Little Ivy League or any of its <br />programs. She provided a history of Little Ivy League's growth over time, indicating <br />that the first conditional use permit related to Little Ivy League was PCUP-84, an <br />application for a daycare facility, approved in August of 2003 for 32 children at <br />4455 Stoneridge Drive, the Pleasanton Community Church site. <br />Ms. Decker continued that the second action was PCUP-138, which was the original <br />request by Little Ivy League for a facility at 2340 Santa Rita Road and approved for a <br />maximum of 30 students, Monday through Thursdayfor2.5 hours per day and <br />Friday fort hours. She noted that in response to an earlier inquiry by the <br />Commission if the program represented this evening to the Commission is the same <br />as what was approved per a conditional use permit, the answer is "no," based on the <br />first conditional use permit issued to Little Ivy League. <br />Ms. Decker then stated that a third action which should be noted is PCUP-143, an <br />application by United Youth Enrichment, a program very similar to Little Ivy League, <br />which was established under the first action earlier described, PCUP-84, at <br />4455 Stoneridge Drive. She noted that the reason this approval was under the <br />Pleasanton Community Church was because tutoring would not be allowed at this <br />site without an umbrella, which was the church. She added that as a result, the <br />church applied for a use permit as well as for an expansion to serve as the umbrella <br />parent, effecting the operation of the United Youth Enrichment as an ancillary use of <br />the church, for an after-school program for a maximum of 25 students. She noted <br />that the church operated its daycare separately for 32 children, bringing the total <br />number of children atthe siteto a maximum of 57. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, December 10, 2008 Page 17 of 35 <br />