My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 121008
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2000-2009
>
2008
>
PC 121008
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/5/2017 4:38:58 PM
Creation date
3/10/2009 9:59:09 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
12/10/2008
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
35
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Ms. Decker stated that at some point, United Youth Enrichment vacated the site and <br />was replaced by Little Ivy League under the auspices of that use permit, and in <br />2006, Pleasanton Community Church vacated the site and Fountain Community <br />Church took over the conditional use permit. She noted that as a result, Fountain <br />Community Church and Little Ivy League were now operating under the same use <br />permit of Pleasanton Community Church and United Youth Enrichment. <br />Ms. Decker explained that use permits run with the land, and a similar facility can <br />operate at the site without any other entitlement provided it complies with the hours <br />of operation and number of children. She added that the Director of Community <br />Development may evaluate and approve a requestfor extended operating hours if <br />found to be insubstantial conformance to the use permit; however, this did not occur <br />at this site. <br />Ms. Decker noted that in this regard, staff has provided the Commission with an <br />e-mail from Mr. Kevin Ho expressing concerns on the operations at 4455 Stoneridge <br />Drive, to which Ms. Soo has provided answers. Ms. Decker stated that this a-mail is <br />coincidental with an action by the City's Code Enforcement Officerwhovisited the <br />site where Little Ivy League was located to determine if it was operating under the <br />original United Youth Enrichment program's use permit of 25 students. She noted <br />that the Officer found that the facility was not in compliance, having about 50 to <br />60 children at the site. <br />Ms. Decker continued that in light of the concurrent application submitted to the City, <br />Little Ivy League then submitted an application to locate at 4430 Willow Road, to be <br />held together with and adjacent to a suite with an application for Fountain <br />Community Church, which was processed and recently approved by the <br />Commission. She stated that during Little Ivy League's leasing process, it <br />determined that the site was no longer viable and found the site at 5925 West Las <br />Positas, which is before the Commission this evening. She noted that the Code <br />Enforcement action begun for 4455 Stoneridge Drive was then held in abeyance <br />because an application had been submitted for a different site. She added that this <br />action is not uncommon with the City's processes. <br />Ms. Decker noted that the Commission had requested the Minutes of the meetings <br />at which PCUP-143 and PCUP-138 were approved and had inquired if the <br />conditions of approval had changed between these actions. She indicated that <br />PCUP-138, the original Little Ivy League approval at 2340 Santa Rita Road, was <br />limited to 30 students at 2.5 hours a day, and PCUP-143, United Youth Enrichment, <br />has a limitation of 25 students for after-hours as well. She noted that while the <br />conditions for both actions were essentially the same in nature, the number of <br />conditions did change, from six conditions for PCUP-138 to nine conditions for <br />PCUP-143. She added that the current application under consideration has <br />19 conditions and have more criteria to abide by. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, December 10, 2008 Page 18 of 35 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.