My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
RES 82037
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
RESOLUTIONS
>
1980-1989
>
1982
>
RES 82037
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/6/2012 2:42:39 PM
Creation date
3/2/2000 6:56:25 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
RESOLUTIONS
DOCUMENT DATE
2/9/1982
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
029682 <br /> <br />existing levels o£ £ire service in the above-mentioned study <br />and as deemed necessary by the City Manager. Developer <br />agrees to participate in the funding of such apparatus, <br />manpower, and other facilities in whichever manner best <br />achieves the maintenance of existing levels of fire service <br />through timely additions of fire safety equipment, facilities, <br />and personnel, as determined by City. In determining the <br />level of participation of such £unding agreed~to'~e~ein, <br /> <br />City shall take into consideration theproject's contribution <br />to~.~ard ~ire services in its ordinary contribution towards <br />funding city services generally (via taxes, etc.). <br /> <br />VI. DEVELOPER'S ~IGHTS <br /> <br /> With reference to each of the agreements contained <br /> <br />herein to place snbject site into one or more'assessment <br />districts, benefit districts, or other district or £unding <br />mechanism requiring approval of all or a majority of properties <br />so included, the Developer agrees to either (1) not protest <br />the establishment of the district or (2) to affirmatively <br />vote for the c~eatiSn of the district o~ other mechanism, <br />depending on the manner of creation of the funding mechanism. <br />However, Developer retains the right to protest that the <br />allocation of cost among various properties is inequitable <br />under any of the aboVe-mentioned funding mechanisms. <br /> <br /> In ~he event the assessment mechanism appears to impose <br />economically infeasible levels of cost upon the project <br />site, the City agrees to explore alternative ~inancing <br />methods. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.