Laserfiche WebLink
17.36.090 <br />Prior to the Beginning of Any Calendar Year. If, prior to January 1st of any year, the city has <br />processed building permit applications seeking the next year's first -come, first- served <br />suballocation which, in the aggregate, exceed the annual suballocation less the small project <br />set - aside, the city shall prorate the permits to developers seeking permits. <br />(a) First Priority. Permits shall be issued first to first -come, first- served projects which were <br />under construction in the prior year and secured permits for, or attempted to secure <br />permits for, all units it was qualified to be issued permits for during that year. <br />(b) Second Priority. Permits shall be issued second to all projects eligible to apply for the <br />available permits. Each project's pro rata share of the available suballocation shall be the <br />percentage derived by the permits sought by the project (subject to the project limitations <br />established herein) divided by all permits sought (subject to the same size limitations). <br />(2) Proration of Project Permits, Prior to Availability of Unused Major Project Units, Small Project <br />Set -Aside Units, or Units Remaining Available on December 1st. If, prior to the determination <br />that unused units may become available in September or on December 1st pursuant to <br />subsections (C)(1)(c) and (C)(I)(d) of this section, the city may require project developers who <br />may seek these units to apply for the units in advance so that, should the aggregate number of <br />permits sought exceed the number to be made available, the city may issue permits on the <br />following basis: <br />(a) First Priority. Perri its shall be issued first to first -come, first -served projects under <br />construction which did not receive permits equal to the project's annual maximum <br />limitation. If the total of these exceeds the permits available, the permits shall be prorated <br />based on each project's requested permits in relation to the total aggregate permits <br />sought. <br />(b) Second Priority. Permits shall be issued second to all projects eligible to apply for the <br />available permits. If the total of these exceeds the permits available, a project's permits <br />shall be prorated based on the total permits issued that calendar year to the project (as of <br />the date of application) in relation to the aggregate of all permits issued to all projects <br />seeking the available units. New projects seeking these permits which have not built any <br />units in that calendar year shall be assumed to have built the annual limit or the total <br />project size, whichever is smaller, in making the proration. In the event such a proration <br />method would allow a project more units than it requests, that project shall he entitled to <br />100 percent of its request, and any remaining units shall be redistributed in the manner <br />described above. (Ord. 2000 § 1, 2009; Ord. 1999 § I, 2009; Ord. 1729 § 2, 1997) <br />(1) <br />17.36.090 Use and loss of growth management approval. <br />A. Affordable Housing Project. <br />I. Building permits may be secured, following normal and customary review and processing procedures, up to <br />the annual limit included in the project approvals for any year. Building permits may be issued at any time <br />during the calendar year and in any number of phases, so long as the annual limit contained in the approval <br />is not exceeded. A building permit issued for a unit in such a project shall be subject to the Uniform Build- <br />ing Code regulations concerning lapsing. <br />2. If an affordable housing project developer wishes to modify its phasing schedule, fails to secure all the <br />building permits for which it was granted an allocation in any calendar year, or allows a building permit to <br />lapse, it shall follow any rules established as a part of its growth management agreement. If no special rules <br />are contained in its agreement, it shall apply to, or be referred to, the city council for its decision as to <br />whether to allow a reallocation of the project. The council may reallocate the project as it deems hest meets <br />the needs of the city. If the project has not begun, the city council may void the growth management ap- <br />proval. <br />(Pleasanton Sup). No, 3, 1 -10) <br />470 <br />