12 - Laserfiche WebLink

members had desired) because staff was unable to draw a distinction between that and the wine bar /wine sales use that Task Force members wished to allow. Need for some flexibility regarding setbacks Staff notes the existing language under "Review Process" on p. 5 which provides for flexibility in implementing both the standards and the guidelines. General: appropriate language for Text on pages 5, 6, 13, 33 and 49 changes • uidelines (i.e. no "shalls ") "shall" to "should" in various guidelines. Bike and ped circulation around and Text or a legend has been added to diagrams through development is not clear on p. 7 and p. 9 to identify bike and •edestrian paths • Policy Issues Yet to be Resolved. The issues outlined below were unresolved at the tirne of the Joint Workshop. Any further recommendations made by the Hacienda Task Force at its January 6 meeting are noted below. Issue Resolved by: The feasibility of potential projects Staff /consultants will review and evaluate pro developed under the TOD Standards and forma numbers provided by the developer and Guidelines will prepare a memo on feasibility. This item is in process and will be available prior to City Council action on the Standards and Guidelines. The provision of group (private) open Some Task Force members wished to provide space or a public park greater encouragement including incentives for a public park to serve new development in Hacienda. Text in the draft was changed to specifically identify that the group open space requirement can be met with a public park. The Planning Commission may wish to consider additional incentives to make a public park an attractive option for developers. Residential density: need for an average As this issue was discussed by the Task Force at density to be included in the TOD its last meeting it appeared to be more an issue Standards and Guidelines of potential incompatibility of new three or four story residential development with surrounding lower intensity residential uses. Additional design guidelines (section D.10) have been added in the revised draft to identify features that assist in making the two types of development compatible such as additional landscaping and architectural treatments. Retail development: how much and The Task Force discussed this issue again at its where? last meeting. All members present, except one, agreed with the minimum retail requirement of 5,000 square feet of retail on Parcel 1 and a minimum of 10,000 s• uare feet for the three Case No. PRZ -57, City ofPleasamon Planning Commission Page 4 of 8