My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
12 ATTACHMENT 6
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2014
>
031814
>
12 ATTACHMENT 6
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/18/2015 3:28:43 PM
Creation date
3/12/2014 3:53:44 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
3/18/2014
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
12 ATTACHMENT 6
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
104
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Commissioner O'Connor stated that if the developer took five units and made Building A <br /> all four-story, the developer could take those five units from the rear building which has <br /> seven units above two-stories tall. <br /> Ms. Stern explained that there is a restriction related to the neighbor on the west side <br /> where the Design Guidelines talks about stepping back some of the stories on that side. <br /> She added that it is potentially possible to relocate some of those three stories to get <br /> more two stories in the back. <br /> Brian Dolan stated that staff will look into that to address Commissioner O'Connor's <br /> concern to try and help the neighbors in the rear. He noted that staff has two concerns: <br /> (1) the reference made by Ms. Stern regarding the commercial neighbor next door, who <br /> was very pro-active during the rezoning and attended a lot of meetings and made sure <br /> that the restrictions be built into the standards for the specific site. (2)This is a more <br /> general concern that if the front is loaded with four stories, that has a certain <br /> presentation to the street that would be of concern if the entire frontage was four stories. <br /> He reiterated that staff will definitely look at this and see if there is a better balance. <br /> Commissioner Allen inquired if there is a possibility of doing any underground-type <br /> parking to reduce the height of the buildings. She indicated that she is not sure if there <br /> are any creative things that have been done in other developments that might be <br /> possible here. <br /> Ms. Stern replied that underground parking is usually an economic question in terms of <br /> being able to make that pencil out. She added that so far, there is no development that <br /> has gone into Pleasanton that has been able to achieve that <br /> THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED. <br /> Kevin Ebrahimi, Vice-President of Development, Summerhill Apartment Communities, <br /> and Applicant, stated that Summerhill Apartment Communities is a privately-owned <br /> company headquartered out of San Ramon, under the Summerhill Housing Group that <br /> has been building apartments and for-sale housing in the Bay Area since 1976. He <br /> indicated that Su mmerhill is somewhat familiar with Pleasanton and its requirements, <br /> having built two for-sale communities in Pleasanton in the past ten years, the first being <br /> Nolan Farms off of Rose Avenue in 2001, and Sycamore Heights off of Sycamore Creek <br /> Way in 2005. He thanked staff, particularly Ms. Stern and Ms. Soo, who have been <br /> very helpful in coordinating and helping them put the application together to meet all the <br /> guidelines and to understand what the community is looking for. <br /> Mr. Ebrahimi stated that staff has covered the project well in its presentation and that he <br /> just wanted to outline some of the reasoning why the site was developed in the way it is <br /> being presented to the Commission tonight. He indicated that the proposed community <br /> fronts West Las Positas Boulevard, with existing commercial buildings to the east and <br /> west, and existing residential communities to the south. He noted that due to the <br /> location of the Arroyo, the site layout allows only a minimum distance of 244 feet from <br /> EXCERPT: PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, September 11, 2013 Page 3 of 24 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.