22 - Laserfiche WebLink

Jenny Soo May 8,2015 Page 9 Also,similar to the 2014 project,the 2015 project could expose residents to stationary noise sources that may exceed acceptable residential standards. The Noise Assessment prepared for the 2014 project by Charles M.Salter Associates,Inc.did not specifically quantify potential noise impacts from the adjacent land uses;however,surrounding uses include residential to the south,a school to the north,and commercial offices to the east and west,all of which are typically compatible with residential uses. Noise levels at the site in 2014 ranged from 54 dB DNL to 65 dB DNL,(inclusive of stationary noise sources)which are within the normally acceptable range for multi-family residential uses as indicated by the Pleasanton General Plan. Current onsite noise levels are not expected to have perceptively changed since 2014. Furthermore,Charles M.Salter Associates confirmed in an April 28,2015 email that the analyses and recommendations from the previously prepared Noise Assessment remain appropriate and applicable to the 2015 project. Nonetheless, the 2015 project would be required to implement Mitigation Measure 4.j-6c,which includes the issuance of noise disclosures and noise complaint procedures to all future residents. In summary,with the implementation of Mitigation Measure 4.J-1 and 4.j-6c,noise impacts related to the 2015 project would continue to be less than significant. Traffic Mitigation Measure 4.N-7:The City shall require developers on the potential sites for rezoning to contribute fair-share funds through the payment of the City of Pleasanton and Tri-Valley Regional traffic impact fees to help fund future improvements to local and regional roadways. Similar to the 2014 project,the 2015 project would result in additional trip generation,albeit to a lesser degree than the 2014 project due to the reduced unit count. The Traffic Impact Analysis prepared for the 2014 project concluded that all study intersections would continue to operate at acceptable LOS during the AM and PM peak hours under all analysis scenarios. This conclusion was based on the incorporation of the project's intersection improvements to West Las Positas Boulevard at Hacienda Drive, and the cumulative scenario planned traffic impact fee(TIF)improvements at the intersections of West Las Positas Boulevard at Hopyard Road,and West Las Positas Boulevard at Stoneridge Drive. Because the 2015 project would result in reduced trip generation as compared to the 2014 project, it is reasonable to conclude that the 2015 project would also not result in unacceptable LOS at any study intersections. In addition,the 2015 project would implement improvements to the West Las Positas Boulevard at Hacienda Drive similar to those of the 2014 project. Consistent with the Supplemental EIR,the 2014 Addendum required the implementation of Mitigation Measure 4.N-7, requiring developers to contribute fair-share funds through the payment of City if Pleasanton and Tri-Valley Regional TIFs to help fund future improvements to local and regional roadways. As such,with the implementation of Mitigation Measure 4.N-7,traffic impacts related to the 2015 project would continue to be less than significant. Utilities and Service Systems Mitigation Measure 4.L-2:Prior to the recordation of a Final Map,the issuance of a grading permit,the issuance of a building permit,or utility extension approval to the site,whichever is sooner, the Applicant shall submit written verification from Zone 7 Water Agency or the City of