My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
22
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2015
>
061615
>
22
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/18/2015 11:53:30 AM
Creation date
6/11/2015 12:21:04 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
6/16/2015
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
22
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
130
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
The SEIR included a Statement of Overriding Considerations for two significant and <br /> unavoidable impacts: <br /> Impact 4.D-1: Development facilitated by the General Plan Amendment and rezoning has the <br /> potential to adversely change the significance of historic resources. <br /> The Irby-Kaplan-Zia and Pleasanton Mobilehome Park properties on Stanley Boulevard <br /> contain older structures that may be historic. Mitigation measures in the SEIR required that <br /> historic evaluations be conducted for the structures before they could be demolished. If <br /> deemed to be historic through these evaluations, the demolition of these structures to make <br /> way for new housing would be a significant and unavoidable impact. Staff notes that the Irby- <br /> Kaplan-Zia and Pleasanton Mobilehome Park properties were ultimately not included in the <br /> nine sites that were selected for multifamily housing. <br /> Impact 4.N-7: Development facilitated by the General Plan Amendment and rezonings could <br /> potentially add traffic to the regional roadway network to the point at which they would operate <br /> unacceptably under cumulative plus project conditions. <br /> Traffic generated by development facilitated under the proposed Housing Element on the <br /> potential sites for rezoning would not worsen any segment projected to operate acceptably to <br /> unacceptable conditions; however, it would increase the volume to capacity ratio (V/C) by <br /> more than 0.03 on two roadway segments projected to operate at LOS F: Sunol Boulevard <br /> (First Street) between Vineyard Avenue and Stanley Boulevard under Year 2015 and 2035 <br /> conditions; and Hopyard Road between Owens Drive and 1-580 under 2035 conditions. Based <br /> on the significance criteria, this is considered a significant impact. Existing development <br /> surrounding these roadways would need to be removed in order to widen them, rendering such <br /> widening infeasible. However, there are improvements that could be made to nearby parallel <br /> corridors which could create more attractive alternative routes and lessen the traffic volumes <br /> on Sunol Boulevard and Hopyard Road. A mitigation measure of the SEIR requires <br /> developers of the potential sites for rezoning to contribute fair-share funds through the <br /> payment of the City of Pleasanton and Tri-Valley Regional traffic impact fees to help fund <br /> future improvements to local and regional roadways. However, because the City cannot be <br /> assured that the collected regional funds would be spent to specifically improve the nearby <br /> parallel corridors as the regional funds are used by the regional agency, the traffic impact <br /> remained significant and unavoidable. Staff notes that the traffic impacts of the nine sites <br /> ultimately selected would be considerably less than the traffic impacts analyzed in the SEIR. <br /> A memo was prepared by FirstCarbon Solutions (attached as Exhibit D) to evaluate the <br /> currently proposed project. The memo concluded that potential environmental impacts from <br /> the current project would be substantially similar to or reduced as compared to those disclosed <br /> in the 2014 Addendum. As such, with the implementation of mitigation identified in the 2014 <br /> Addendum and discussed herein, the current project would not result in any impacts beyond <br /> those considered in the Supplemental EIR. Therefore, the 2014 Addendum, in combination <br /> with this memo, satisfies the requirements of CEQA for the current project and no further <br /> environmental analysis is warranted. <br /> Summerhill Housing Group Planning Commission <br /> Page 26 of 28 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.