My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
11 ATTACHMENTS 9 -16
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2015
>
110315
>
11 ATTACHMENTS 9 -16
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/28/2015 3:38:00 PM
Creation date
10/14/2015 3:54:32 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
11/3/2015
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
11 ATTACHMENTS 9-16
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
270
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
LL° <br /> • <br /> SIERRA /0._ N <br /> C LU B CITY OF PLEMSJINTON <br /> x-21 FOUNDED 1892 <br /> San Francisco Bay chapter JUN 112015 <br /> Serving the counties of Alameda, Contra Costa, Mann, and San Francisco CITY MANAGER <br /> June 4, 2015 <br /> Pleasanton Mayor and City Council <br /> Pleasanton Planning Commission <br /> 123 Main Street <br /> Pleasanton, CA 94566 <br /> Lund Ranch 11 Environmental Impact Report: Deviation from the environmentally sound option <br /> Honorable Mayor, members of the City Council, and members of the Planning Commission, <br /> In past recent weeks, the environmental impact report was released for Lund Ranch II. It contained <br /> the results of a review of a number of options for the construction of a modest number of homes and an <br /> access road. The Sierra Club's local chapter(which includes Pleasanton)has had members perform a <br /> review of this EIR, and they concur with the report's findings, and with the developer, that the Lund <br /> 41 Ranch Road access is the preferred environmental approach to minimize impacts and avoid <br /> construction on high sloping ground. <br /> However, it has come to our attention that the City of Pleasanton administration is proposing to <br /> overrule, and deviate from, the EIR and attempt to push a second road through steep-sloped ground. <br /> This additional road is not the environmentally preferred solution, and it will also likely to run afoul of <br /> Measure PP, which voters approved for the purpose of preventing environmental damage in steep- <br /> sloped terrain. <br /> It is therefore our earnest request that the City administrators use the EIR as the impartial planning tool <br /> and implement the EIR's preferred project configuration with the lower impact road that does not violate <br /> Measure PP. <br /> Sincerely,tia‘ 52a4,, <br /> Rebecca Evans, Chapter Chair <br /> Sierra Club San Francisco Bay Chapter <br /> 2530 San Pablo Ave., Suite I Berkeley, CA 94702 Tel. (510/8 t8-0800 www.sfbay.sierraclub.org <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.