Laserfiche WebLink
r" !ESA <br />I Protect Oaschatiori and Approach <br />received on the NOP will be taken into consideration in determining which <br />topics to analyze in the SE1R. <br />Task 3. Administrative Supplemental Environmental <br />Impact Report (SEIR} <br />The analysis in the SEIR will evaluate the effects of the project compared to <br />an existing baseline (to be established, generally, at the time a NOP is issued <br />for the SEER). Because this document will supplement the previously <br />prepared, the analysis will evaluate whether implementation of the Johnson <br />Drive Economic Development Zone would result in any new or substantially <br />more severe impacts than those identified in the prior General Plan and GPA <br />EIRs. whether due to changes in the project, changes in circumstances, or the <br />availability of new information. Because the previous EERs— particularly. the <br />GPA EIR—are relatively recent. we anticipate that changes to the project <br />(i.e., implementation of the general plan amendment and rezoning for the <br />Johnson Drive site) would likely be the cause of new and/or more severe <br />impacts. should any be identified. <br />ESA will prepare a SEIR including a robust technical analysis of the <br />identified key environmental issues. Based upon the RFP, for the purposes of <br />this proposal ESA assumes that four issues—Aesthetics, Air Quality, Noise, <br />and Transportation —will be fully analyzed in the SEER, with the remainder <br />of the environmental topics on the CEQA Checklist assumed to be discussed <br />in lesser detail, in a separate section of the document. Mitigation measures <br />from the General Plan EIR and/or GPA EIR will be reviewed for the <br />applicability to the proposed Johnson Drive project. <br />As set forth in the RFP, ESA will provide the City with five (5) copies of the <br />ADEIR, as well as one unbound copy and an electronic copy. <br />Aesthetics/Light and Glare. The impacts of the rezoning on aesthetic, <br />visual, and scenic resources will be evaluated. including potential loss of <br />views and effects of increased lighting on motorists and residents in the City <br />(and, potentially, residents of Dublin. immediately across Interstate 580). <br />Policies and programs provided in the General Plan and standard City <br />requirements will be evaluated as to their effect of mitigating or avoiding any <br />potentially significant effects. Mitigation measures from the General Plan <br />EIR and/or GPA EIR will be revised for their potential to reduce impacts at <br />the project site. Additional mitigation measures for aesthetic, visual and <br />scenic resources will be identified where necessary to reduce any significant <br />effects. <br />Visual Massing Simulations <br />ESA will team with Environmental Vision to provide visual massing <br />simulations for the proposed project in support of the Aesthetics analysis. <br />The simulations would be completed from three public viewpoints and <br />reflect before and after images of the project site. <br />• Air Quality. The air quality analysis will focus on air quality effects <br />primarily from increased traffic, including any identified health risk effects, <br />City of Pleasanton Johnson Cm* Ewnamac tbveroomonr Ions E!R 1- 5 <br />