Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES <br />of <br />THE MEETING <br />of <br />THE CITY COUNCIL <br />Pleasanton, California <br />September 7, 1965 <br />THE CITY COUNCIL met in Regular Adjourned Session at 8 :00 P.M. on the above date with <br />Mayor Long presiding. <br />ROLL CALL by the Deputy City Clerk evidenced the following attendance: Councilman <br />Cairo, Harding, McWilliams and Mayor Long were present. Councilman Bubics was absent. <br />Mr. Fales, City Manager, Mr. Struthers, City Attorney, Mt. Campbell, City Engineer, <br />Mrs. Lund, Deputy City Clerk were present. Mrs. Woodward, City Clerk, were absent. <br />PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG was led by Mayor Long. <br />MEETING OPEN FOR ANY MEMBER OF THE AUDIENCE TO ADDRESS THE COUNCIL No one addressed <br />the chair. <br />PUBLIC HEARINGS were not scheduled for this meeting. <br />REPORTS OF BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS were not scheduled for this meeting. <br />PRESENTATION BY PLEASANTON JUNIOR CHAMBER OF COMMERCE RE: CITY THEME CONTEST <br />Mr. Howard T. Garrigan, City Theme Contest Chairman for the Pleasanton Jaycees, <br />presented eleven final entries for the City theme contest. He went on to propose <br />that these final entries be considered by the City Council in private so as not to. <br />incur the unfair pressure of the various applicants involved. The list that was <br />presented to the Council simply consisted of a number and a theme suggestion. How- <br />ever, the Junior Chamber also submitted a list of names and addresses corresponding <br />to the numbers in a sealed envelope to the City Clerk with the suggestion that it be <br />opened only after a decision was made with regard to the selection of the theme. <br />These suggestions were approved by the Council and the final entries for the theme <br />contest were taken under consideration. <br />REPORTS OF THE CITY MANAGER <br />C. M. Report No. 52.- Freeway Maintenance Agreement; Santa Rita Tassajara Interchanv <br />Et. Fales read the City Manager's Report No. 52 which outlined the areas of responsibi <br />lity and the general terms of the freeway maintenance agreement. Basically, the <br />agreement provides for City maintenance of all the roadway up to the bridge structure, <br />and maintenance of all the roadway and railings on the bridge structure up to the <br />City limits. The structure itself will be maintained by the state. The City would <br />also maintain a small amount of unpaved shoulder area within the freeway right -of- <br />way and immediately adjacent to the roadway. <br />It was moved by Councilman Cairo and seconded by Councilman Harding that Resolution <br />No. 65 -153 authorizing the City staff to execute the aboveroadway maintenance agreemen <br />be adopted. <br />The roll call vote was as follows: <br />AYES: Councilmen Harding, McWilliams, Cairo and Mayor Long <br />NOES: None <br />ABSENT: Councilman Bubics <br />C. M. Report No. 53 Obligation of D V Builders, Inc., Re: Relocation of Vervais <br />Avenue Water Facilities <br />Mt. Fales read the City Manager's Report No. 53 which related the background of the <br />agreement. Among other things Fales stated that D V Builders had agreed to provide <br />a portion of the cost of relocating the water facilities presently located at Vervais <br />Avenue to a point immediately North of Alisal Elementary School. <br />Mr. Fales went on to say that negotiations between D V Builders and the City had <br />just been completed and that it had been determined that D V's obligation was <br />$35,600.00. He concluded by recommending that the City Council accept or approve <br />a payment to the City by D V Builders, Inc., in the amount of $35,600.00, and by <br />resolution relieve the developer of any further obligation regarding the relocation <br />of these water facilities as set forth in the Annexation Agreement. <br />It was moved by Councilman Harding and seconded by Councilman McWilliams that Res- <br />olution No. 65 -154 approving the payment by D V Builders to the City of $35,600 <br />and relieving them of any further obligation as outlined in the Annexation Agreement <br />be adopted. <br />9 -7 -65 <br />