14 ATTACHMENT 1-5 - Laserfiche WebLink

PUD-138 and Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map 8616 Planning Commission 26 of 28 with sufficient space to allow parking and staging for periodic maintenance of the lift station. Staff has included conditions to address these items. The Engineering Department has reviewed the plans and recommended the following be in the final plans: Drainage Improvements ▪ Trash racks be provided at storm inlets; ▪ Emergency overland release flow pathways be included; ▪ Design of the grassy swale in Parcel B be revised in order to percolate stormwater to the underlying soil. ▪ A connection between the discharge end of a new 36” storm pipe within Parcel A to the existing pipe beneath Alisal Street is proposed Grading ▪ The area labeled for landslide repair needs to be coincide with the area in the Geotechnical Report. ▪ Revise the grading on Lots 1-7 by adding a low retaining wall to prevent runoff onto adjoining properties on the north side. ▪ Additional grading may be needed on Lots 12-15 in order to the pad height differences. Staff has included conditions of approval to address these items. Street Lights HVSP states streetlights are not required “Unless required for vehicular safety at sharp road turns and intersections.” It would therefore be prudent for the applicant to install streetlights according to Pleasanton Standard Detail 508 only at the following locations: ▪ Spotorno Ranch Drive intersection at Alisal Street ▪ Spotorno Ranch Drive intersection at Westbridge Lane ▪ Southern terminus of trail at Westbridge Lane (near SW corner of Lot 15) ▪ Western terminus of trail at Alisal Street (near NW corner of Parcel A) ▪ Eastern intersection of trail at Spotorno Ranch Drive (near SE corner of Lot 1) Staff has included conditions of approval to address this item. ALTERNATIVES As outlined in the above analysis, staff believes the project, as proposed and conditioned, would meet the requirements of the HVSP requirements for development of the Spotorno Flat Area and not create adverse impacts, and recommends the Planning Commission recommend approval to the City Council. However, alternatives to the proposal that could be considered by the Planning Commission include: 1. Recommend denial of the project; or 2. Recommend approval of the proposal with modifications to the site layout, building designs, uses, etc.