My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
14 ATTACHMENT 6 - Appendix A - E
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2022
>
021522
>
14 ATTACHMENT 6 - Appendix A - E
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/10/2022 11:41:35 AM
Creation date
2/10/2022 11:33:11 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
2/15/2022
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
Document Relationships
14
(Message)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2022\021522
14 ATTACHMENT 1-5
(Message)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2022\021522
14 ATTACHMENT 6 - Appendix F - I
(Attachment)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2022\021522
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
358
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City of Pleasanton–Spotorno Ranch Reduced Development Project <br />Initial Study/Consistency Checklist Environmental Checklist <br /> <br /> <br />FirstCarbon Solutions 139 <br />https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/2148/21480021/Consistency Checklist/21480021 Spotorno Ranch Consistency Checklist ScreenCheck.docx <br />be drawn from the local labor pool within the greater Bay Area and, therefore, would not indirectly <br />induce substantial growth.35 Therefore, the proposed project would not result in any peculiar effects <br />and would not result in new or more severe impacts related to population growth beyond what was <br />previously analyzed in the 1998 HVSP FEIR. <br />b) Displacement of Persons or Housing <br />Would the project: Displace substantial numbers of existing people or housing, necessitating the <br />construction of replacement housing elsewhere? <br />The approximately 112-acre project site is undeveloped and is dominated by mature vegetation and <br />native grasslands, including hilly grazing lands. No existing residential units or people are living on- <br />site; therefore, the project would not displace significant numbers of housing units or residents. <br />There is a residence located on Lot 96 of the HVSP, but this residence is located outside of the <br />boundaries of the project site, and the proposed project would not result in the displacement of this <br />housing unit or its residents. As a result, the proposed project would not displace any people or <br />housing units, and no replacement housing would be needed. There would be no impacts. <br />Therefore, the proposed project would not result in any peculiar effects and would not result in new <br />or more severe impacts related to the displacement of people or housing beyond what was <br />previously analyzed in the 1998 HVSP FEIR. <br />FEIR Mitigation Measures <br />None required. <br />Conclusion <br />No new significant impacts to population and housing would occur. The conclusions from the 1998 <br />HVSP FEIR remain unchanged. <br /> <br />35 City of Pleasanton Happy Valley Specific Plan, Table V-1 Housing Summary by PUD District, page 25, June 1998.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.