My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
14 ATTACHMENT 6 - Appendix A - E
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2022
>
021522
>
14 ATTACHMENT 6 - Appendix A - E
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/10/2022 11:41:35 AM
Creation date
2/10/2022 11:33:11 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
2/15/2022
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
Document Relationships
14
(Message)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2022\021522
14 ATTACHMENT 1-5
(Message)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2022\021522
14 ATTACHMENT 6 - Appendix F - I
(Attachment)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2022\021522
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
358
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City of Pleasanton–Spotorno Ranch Reduced Development Project <br />Environmental Checklist Initial Study/Consistency Checklist <br /> <br /> <br />140 FirstCarbon Solutions <br />https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/2148/21480021/Consistency Checklist/21480021 Spotorno Ranch Consistency Checklist ScreenCheck.docx <br />Environmental Issues <br />CEQA Section 15183(b) Criteria <br />Prior 1998 <br />HVSP FEIR <br />Determination <br />Effect <br />Peculiar to <br />Project or <br />Site? <br />New <br />Significant <br />Effect? <br />New <br />Significant <br />Off-site, <br />Cumulative <br />Impact? <br />New <br />Information, <br />More Severe <br />Adverse <br />Impact? <br />4.15 Public Services <br />Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or <br />physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the <br />construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable <br />service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: <br />a) Fire protection? Less than <br />significant <br />impact with <br />mitigation <br />incorporated <br />No No No No <br />b) Police protection? Less than <br />significant <br />impact <br />No No No No <br />c) Schools? None No No No No <br />d) Parks? Less than <br />significant <br />impact <br />No No No No <br />e) Other public facilities? None No No No No <br /> <br />a) Fire Protection <br />Would the project: Result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of <br />new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically <br />altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant <br />environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response <br />times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: Fire <br />protection? <br />The 1998 HVSP FEIR determined that residential development in the Spotorno Upper Valley Medium <br />Density Residential area will be located near an area of high wildfire risk, and that the Specific Plan’s <br />requirements for preparation and approval of a Wildland/Urban Interface Management Plan that <br />contains: (1) standards for the management of vegetation at the edge of the wildland or open space <br />area near built areas; and (2) standards for the design and construction of buildings adjacent to the <br />wildland or open space areas, pursuant to MM O1 and MM O2, respectively, will mitigate the risk in <br />this location to an acceptable level. Additionally, to protect new development from fire hazards, all <br />residential structures located beyond the 5-minute response time from the nearest fire station must <br />be equipped with automatic fire sprinklers and Class A fire-retardant roofing. The 1998 HVSP FEIR <br />determined there would be no significant impacts, and no mitigation measures are required, <br />although MM 01 and MM 02 were included in the 1998 HVSP FEIR as conditions of approval.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.