My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
14 ATTACHMENT 6 - Appendix A - E
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2022
>
021522
>
14 ATTACHMENT 6 - Appendix A - E
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/10/2022 11:41:35 AM
Creation date
2/10/2022 11:33:11 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
2/15/2022
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
Document Relationships
14
(Message)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2022\021522
14 ATTACHMENT 1-5
(Message)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2022\021522
14 ATTACHMENT 6 - Appendix F - I
(Attachment)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2022\021522
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
358
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City of Pleasanton–Spotorno Ranch Reduced Development Project <br />Environmental Checklist Initial Study/Consistency Checklist <br /> <br /> <br />144 FirstCarbon Solutions <br />https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/2148/21480021/Consistency Checklist/21480021 Spotorno Ranch Consistency Checklist ScreenCheck.docx <br />because of the semi-rural character of the Happy Valley Area and the availability of both private and <br />municipal open space associated with the homes in this area. Additionally, the payment of in lieu <br />park development fees was determined to ensure that impacts are less than significant.37 The 1998 <br />HVSP FEIR determined that there would be no significant impacts on recreation and parks and that <br />no mitigation measures are required. <br />The California Department of Parks and Recreation, East Bay Regional Park District, and City of <br />Pleasanton provide various parks, trails, and community facilities for public use throughout the City. <br />City park standards are established in the City’s 2025 General Plan. Specifically, Program 10.18 of the <br />General Plan aims to achieve a level of park facilities equal to 5 acres per 1,000 population or 0.005 <br />acre per person. As noted above, the City currently provides approximately 5.1 acres of improved <br />neighborhood and community parks per 1,000 residents. The City maintains 40 community and <br />neighborhood parks, approximately 24 miles of trails, and over 800 acres of undeveloped open <br />space. Based on projected population growth and subsequent buildout, the General Plan estimates <br />the ratio of park facilities to population to increase to 0.008 acre per person or 5.8 acres per 1,000 <br />population. <br />The development of 22 single-family residential units with 22 ADUs would be expected to result in a <br />population increase of approximately 110 people based on a conservative estimate of three persons <br />per household for the primary single-family units, rounding up from the average City of Pleasanton <br />household size of 2.81 persons per household 38; and adding a very conservative estimate of 2 <br />persons per ADU. The future development of planned parks within the City, would be funded in part <br />by the project’s Capital Facility Fee and so would not affect the City’s ability to maintain its parkland <br />ratio. The proposed project would contribute on-site open space for use by the residents of the <br />project. Because the new residents would utilize the proposed project’s on-site open space and <br />trails, and new connections to the regional trail system, the proposed project would not result in the <br />need for construction of new or expanded existing park facilities. Therefore, the proposed project <br />would not result in any peculiar effects and would not result in new or more severe impacts related <br />to parks beyond what was previously analyzed in the 1998 HVSP FEIR. <br />Other public facilities, such as libraries, were not analyzed in the 1998 HVSP FEIR. No determination <br />was made in the 1998 HVSP FEIR regarding the level of significance related to other public facilities. <br />The City of Pleasanton provides public library services to its residents. The Pleasanton Library <br />encompasses 30,000 square feet. The General Plan includes the Pleasanton Public Library Space <br />Needs Assessment (2004) report which documented the need for approximately 72,800 square feet <br />of space to meet the long-term library service needs of its residents. <br />The proposed project has the potential to generate 110 new residents to the City, a nominal increase <br />when compared with the existing population of 67,600 that was evaluated in the General Plan as <br />being served by the City’s library system. As noted above, the proposed project would follow <br />provisions of both the HVSP and the City’s General Plan. As a result, the project’s generation of <br /> <br />37 The Park Dedication Fee, which was in effect in 1998 when the HVSP FEIR was adopted, has subsequently been subsumed within <br />the Capital Facility Fee per Resolution 18-1047. <br />38 United States Census Bureau. 2021. QuickFacts: Pleasanton city, California. Website: <br />https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/pleasantoncitycalifornia. Accessed May 10, 2021.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.