14 ATTACHMENT 6 - Appendix A - E

City of Pleasanton–Spotorno Ranch Reduced Development Project Initial Study/Consistency Checklist Environmental Checklist FirstCarbon Solutions 151 https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/2148/21480021/Consistency Checklist/21480021 Spotorno Ranch Consistency Checklist ScreenCheck.docx Pedestrian System–The project would create a significant impact related to the pedestrian system if any of the following criteria are met: 1. Disrupt existing pedestrian facilities; or 2. Interfere with planned pedestrian facilities; or 3. Create inconsistencies with adopted pedestrian system plans, guidelines, policies, or standards. B. Conflict or be inconsistent with CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.3, subdivision (b). Specifically, cause substantial additional VMT per capita, per service population, or other appropriate efficiency measure. 1. For residential uses, a project would cause substantial additional VMT if it exceeds existing regional household VMT per capita minus 15 percent. 2. For office or industrial uses, a project would cause substantial additional VMT if it exceeds the existing regional VMT per worker minus 15 percent. 3. For non-locally serving retail uses or retail uses over 50,000 square feet, project would increase VMT per service population. C. Substantially increase hazards due to a geometric design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment). D. Result in inadequate emergency access. General Plan Significance Thresholds The following criteria is applied to develop recommendations designed to enhance mobility for all travel modes, including transit vehicles, without degrading or precluding the provision of planned bicycle, pedestrian, and transit facilities. Intersection or roadway improvements may be recommended under the following circumstances: • The project deteriorates the operations of a signalized intersection from LOS D (or better) to LOS E or LOS F3 • The project adds 10 or more trips to an intersection projected to operate at LOS E or F prior to the addition of project traffic • The project deteriorates the operations of a controlled movement at an unsignalized intersection from LOS E or better to LOS F, or at intersections where a controlled movement already operates at LOS F, one of the following: 1. Project traffic results in satisfaction at the peak-hour volume traffic signal warrant; 2. Project traffic increases minor movement delay by more than 30 seconds; or 3. Where the peak-hour volume signal warrant is met without Project traffic and delay cannot be measured, Project increases traffic by 10 or more vehicles per lane on the controlled approach.