14 ATTACHMENT 6 - Appendix A - E

City of Pleasanton–Spotorno Ranch Reduced Development Project Environmental Checklist Initial Study/Consistency Checklist 174 FirstCarbon Solutions https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/2148/21480021/Consistency Checklist/21480021 Spotorno Ranch Consistency Checklist ScreenCheck.docx Environmental Issues CEQA Section 15183(b) Criteria Prior 1998 HVSP FEIR Determination Effect Peculiar to Project or Site? New Significant Effect? New Significant Off-site, Cumulative Impact? New Information, More Severe Adverse Impact? 4.20 Mandatory Findings of Significance a) Does the project have the potential to substantially degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, substantially reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal, or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? Less than Significant after mitigation No No No No b) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? (“Cumulatively considerable” means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects)? Significant and unavoidable No No No No c) Does the project have environmental effects, which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? Less than significant after mitigation No No No No a) Potential Degradation to Environment and Examples of California History or Prehistory Does the project: Have the potential to substantially degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, substantially reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal, or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? Less than significant after mitigation. The 1998 HVSP FEIR concluded that the proposed project would have less than significant impact on biological resources and cultural resources after implementation of mitigation. The proposed project represents a portion of the 1998 HVSP FEIR’s buildout assumptions and therefore would yield a similar conclusion. Impacts would be less than significant.