Laserfiche WebLink
City of Pleasanton–Spotorno Ranch Reduced Development Project <br />Initial Study/Consistency Checklist Environmental Checklist <br /> <br /> <br />FirstCarbon Solutions 87 <br />https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/2148/21480021/Consistency Checklist/21480021 Spotorno Ranch Consistency Checklist ScreenCheck.docx <br />impacts to this resource. Additionally, the 1998 HVSP FEIR determined that prehistoric cultural sites, <br />features, or objects could be inadvertently discovered during project implementation. The 1998 <br />HVSP FEIR indicated that MM K2 would require a qualified Archaeologist to make recommendations <br />in the case that previously “undiscovered prehistoric resources” were discovered. The 1998 HVSP <br />FEIR concluded that implementation of MM K2 would reduce impacts on previously undiscovered <br />cultural resources to less than significant. <br />An initial archaeological reconnaissance of the Spotorno property was conducted as part of the 1998 <br />HVSP FEIR. A general surface reconnaissance was conducted by two Archaeologists and covered the <br />approximately 31 acre Spotorno Flat Area, where proposed development would occur for the <br />current Spotorno Ranch project. The survey covered north/south transects approximately 15 to 20 <br />meters apart. The recently plowed flatter fields afforded good to poor surface visibility; however, the <br />area east of the flatter areas offered very poor to nonexistent surface visibility due to very thick <br />annual grasses and other vegetation. No evidence of prehistoric cultural use or archaeological <br />resources was found on the Spotorno Property project area by surface survey, nor are any recorded <br />on this previously surveyed parcel. <br />On March 7, 2018, FCS Senior Archaeologist, Dana DePietro, conducted an updated pedestrian <br />survey for unrecorded cultural resources. The survey began in the southwest corner of the project <br />site and moved east, using north–south transects spaced at 15-meter intervals whenever possible. <br />As noted in the previous survey, the project area has been subject to disking and other ground <br />disturbance associated with agricultural activity at the site. Soil visibility was relatively poor across <br />the site, ranging from 15 to 30 percent, due to grasses and ground cover. Soils in sections of poor <br />visibility were intermittently inspected using a hand trowel. Observed soils were largely composed of <br />dark brown silty soil with high clay content, interspersed with small (2 to 3-centimeter) stones <br />primarily composed of quartz, schist, and basalt. Soils in the west of the project area were noticeably <br />darker in color; however, upon close inspection at multiple locations, did not contain artifacts or <br />materials consistent with midden soils. <br />Survey conditions were documented using digital photographs and field notes. During the survey, <br />the FCS Archaeologist examined all areas of the exposed ground surface for prehistoric artifacts (e.g., <br />fire-affected rock, milling tools, flaked stone tools, tool-making debris, ceramics), soil discoloration <br />and depressions that might indicate the presence of a cultural midden, faunal and human <br />osteological remains, and features indicative of the former presence of structures or buildings (e.g., <br />postholes, standing exterior walls, foundations) or historic debris (e.g., glass, metal, ceramics). <br />Particular attention was paid to the southeast of the project area, as it is the closest the creek <br />running parallel to Happy Valley Road. Water and natural resources are traditionally considered to <br />have higher potential for cultural sensitivity as they were attractive locations for prehistoric human <br />settlement, such as CA-ALA-24. All areas of proposed development were closely inspected for <br />culturally modified soils or other indicators of potential historic or prehistoric resources. No historic <br />or prehistoric cultural resources or raw materials commonly used in the manufacture of tools (e.g., <br />obsidian, Franciscan chert) were found in these areas. <br />The February 15, 2018, record search results from the NWIC confirmed the presence of prehistoric <br />archaeological resource CA-ALA-24 within 0.5 mile of the project site. The resource is recorded as