My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
14 ATTACHMENT 6 - Appendix A - E
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2022
>
021522
>
14 ATTACHMENT 6 - Appendix A - E
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/10/2022 11:41:35 AM
Creation date
2/10/2022 11:33:11 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
2/15/2022
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
Document Relationships
14
(Message)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2022\021522
14 ATTACHMENT 1-5
(Message)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2022\021522
14 ATTACHMENT 6 - Appendix F - I
(Attachment)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2022\021522
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
358
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City of Pleasanton–Spotorno Ranch Reduced Development Project <br />Initial Study/Consistency Checklist Environmental Checklist <br /> <br /> <br />FirstCarbon Solutions 95 <br />https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/2148/21480021/Consistency Checklist/21480021 Spotorno Ranch Consistency Checklist ScreenCheck.docx <br />Environmental Issues <br />Prior 1998 <br />HVSP FEIR <br />Determination <br />CEQA Section 15183(b) Criteria <br />Effect <br />Peculiar to <br />Project or <br />Site? <br />New <br />Significant <br />Effect? <br />New <br />Significant <br />Off-site, <br />Cumulative <br />Impact? <br />New <br />Information, <br />More Severe <br />Adverse <br />Impact? <br />4.7 Geology and Soils <br />Would the project: <br />a) Directly or indirectly cause potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death <br />involving: <br />i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, <br />as delineated on the most recent <br />Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault <br />Zoning Map issued by the State <br />Geologist for the area or based on <br />other substantial evidence of a <br />known fault? Refer to Division of <br />Mines and Geology Special <br />Publication 42? <br />Less than <br />significant <br />impact with <br />mitigation <br />incorporated <br />No No No No <br />ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? Significant <br />and <br />unavoidable <br />impact <br />No No No No <br />iii) Seismic-related ground failure, <br />including liquefaction? <br />Significant <br />and <br />unavoidable <br />impact <br />No No No No <br />iv) Landslides? Less than <br />significant <br />impact with <br />mitigation <br />incorporated <br />No No No No <br />b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the <br />loss of topsoil? <br />None No No No No <br />c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that <br />is unstable, or that would become <br />unstable as a result of the project, and <br />potentially result in on- or off-site <br />landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, <br />liquefaction or collapse? <br />Significant <br />and <br />unavoidable <br />impact <br />No No No No <br />d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined <br />in Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building <br />Code (1994), creating substantial direct <br />or indirect risks to life or property? <br />Less than <br />significant <br />impact with <br />mitigation <br />incorporated <br />No No No No
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.