My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
14 ATTACHMENT 6 - Appendix A - E
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2022
>
021522
>
14 ATTACHMENT 6 - Appendix A - E
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/10/2022 11:41:35 AM
Creation date
2/10/2022 11:33:11 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
2/15/2022
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
Document Relationships
14
(Message)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2022\021522
14 ATTACHMENT 1-5
(Message)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2022\021522
14 ATTACHMENT 6 - Appendix F - I
(Attachment)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2022\021522
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
358
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City of Pleasanton–Spotorno Ranch Reduced Development Project <br />Environmental Checklist Initial Study/Consistency Checklist <br /> <br /> <br />96 FirstCarbon Solutions <br />https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/2148/21480021/Consistency Checklist/21480021 Spotorno Ranch Consistency Checklist ScreenCheck.docx <br />Environmental Issues <br />Prior 1998 <br />HVSP FEIR <br />Determination <br />CEQA Section 15183(b) Criteria <br />Effect <br />Peculiar to <br />Project or <br />Site? <br />New <br />Significant <br />Effect? <br />New <br />Significant <br />Off-site, <br />Cumulative <br />Impact? <br />New <br />Information, <br />More Severe <br />Adverse <br />Impact? <br />e) Have soils incapable of adequately <br />supporting the use of septic tanks or <br />alternative wastewater disposal systems <br />where sewers are not available for the <br />disposal of wastewater? <br />None No No No No <br />f) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique <br />paleontological resource or site or unique <br />geologic feature? <br />None No No No No <br /> <br />a) Earthquake Hazards <br />Would the project: Directly or indirectly cause potential substantial adverse effects, including the <br />risk of loss, injury or death involving: (i)Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as <br />delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map <br />issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence <br />of a known fault; (ii) Strong Seismic Ground Shaking; (iii) Seismic-related ground <br />failure, including liquefaction; or (iv) Landslides. <br />i) Fault Rupture <br />The 1998 HVSP FEIR determined that the project site is located in the seismically active San Francisco <br />Bay Region and within the San Andreas Fault System. According to the 1998 HVSP FEIR, the Verona <br />Fault trends southeast-northwest through the eastern portion of the project site. The Verona Fault is <br />approximately 5 miles long and is considered capable of generating a magnitude 6.3 earthquake.22 <br />Structures and constructed slopes placed across the fault could be damaged by fault displacement. <br />According to the 1998 HVSP FEIR, the potential impacts associated with fault rupture can be <br />mitigated through preparation, review, and approval of a geologic report, consistent with MM H7. <br />The 1998 HVSP FEIR concluded that impacts related to the potential for damage resulting from fault <br />rupture was less than significant with implementation of the required mitigation. <br />The project site is located within a State of California Earthquake Fault Hazard Zone for the Verona <br />Fault, which crosses the site adjacent to the 25 percent slope limit. Several other faults, including the <br />Calaveras Fa ult and Las Positas Fault , are located approximately 2 miles southwest and 4 miles east <br />of the project site, respectively. The Greenville Fault is located approximately 10 miles to the east. <br />The Hayward Fault is located approximately 7 miles to the southwest. The San Andreas Fault is <br />located approximately 27 miles to the southwest. The project site is located in an area of high <br />seismicity, as is all of the San Francisco Bay Area. However, all development associated with the <br /> <br />22 Wesnousky, S.G., 1986, Earthquakes, Quaternary Faults, and Seismic Hazards in California, Journal of Geophysical Research, Vol. 91, <br />No. Bl2, pp. 12,587-12,631.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.