My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
08
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2023
>
020723
>
08
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/2/2023 1:53:33 PM
Creation date
2/2/2023 1:52:20 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
2/7/2023
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
136
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
AUGUSTIN BERNAL MOUNTAIN BIKE TRAIL PROJECT DRAFT INITIAL STUDY <br /> Less Than <br /> Significant <br /> Potentially Impact With Less Than <br /> Significant Mitigation Significant <br /> Impact Incorporated Impact No Impact <br /> b) A resource determined by the lead <br /> agency, in its discretion and <br /> supported by substantial evidence, <br /> to be significant pursuant to criteria <br /> set forth in subdivision (c)of Public <br /> Resources Code Section 5024.1. In <br /> applyingthe criteria set forth in El El <br /> subdivision (c)of Public Resource <br /> Code Section 5024.1,the lead <br /> agency shall consider the <br /> significance of the resource to a <br /> California Native American tribe? <br /> Setting <br /> The project is subject to compliance with Assembly Bill (AB) 52 (California Public Resources Code [PRC] <br /> Section 21074), which requires consideration of impacts to tribal cultural resources as part of the CEQA <br /> process and requires the CEQA lead agency to notify any groups(who have requested notification)who are <br /> traditionally or culturally affiliated with the geographic area of the project.AB 52 requires lead agencies to <br /> consult with California Native American Tribes that request such consultation prior to completing <br /> environmental review in accordance with CEQA. AB 52 provides for the inclusion of California tribes' <br /> expertise regarding cultural resources and a process for governing bodies to incorporate tribal knowledge <br /> into the CEQA review process.Accordingly,the City sent notification letters to eight Native American tribes <br /> who are traditionally or culturally affiliated with the project area. None of the tribes have requested <br /> consultation and none have identified any concerns regarding the known or potential presence of tribal <br /> cultural resources in the project vicinity. <br /> Additionally, Dudek contacted the NAHC on February 19, 2021, to request a search of the Sacred Lands <br /> File. The NAHC responded on March 2, 2021, indicating that the search failed to identify any Native <br /> American resources in the vicinity of the project and provided a list of individuals and organizations to <br /> contact that may have additional information. Dudek has not followed up contacting these individuals and <br /> organizations. <br /> Impact Discussion <br /> a) Would the project cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural <br /> resource,defined in Public Resources Code section 21074 as either a site,feature,place,cultural <br /> landscape that is geographically defined in terms of the size and scope of the landscape, sacred <br /> place,or object with cultural value to a California Native American tribe, and that is: <br /> i) Listed or eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources, or in a local <br /> register of historical resources as defined in Public Resources Code section 5O2O.1(k)? <br /> 12956 <br /> DUDEK 81 April 2022 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.