My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
ITEM 23 ATTACHMENT 1 - CEQA Checklist
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2024
>
071624
>
ITEM 23 ATTACHMENT 1 - CEQA Checklist
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/8/2024 12:24:59 PM
Creation date
7/8/2024 11:58:32 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
7/16/2024
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
1650
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City of Pleasanton—Merritt Property Project <br />15183 Consistency Checklist Consistency Checklist <br /> <br /> <br /> 85 <br />in Rohnert Park, California, by Basin Research Associates, in compliance with <br />Program 5.1 of the General Plan. The purpose of this review was to access <br />existing cultural resource survey reports, archaeological site records and <br />historic maps, and evaluate whether any previously documented prehistoric <br />or historic archaeological sites, architectural resources, cultural landscapes, <br />or other resources exist within or near the project site. <br />To identify additional historic properties or resources, the current inventories <br />of the NRHP, the CRHR, the California Historical Landmarks (CHL) list, the <br />California Points of Historical Interest (CHPI) list, and the California Built <br />Environment Resource Directory (BERD) for Alameda County. <br />The results of the records search indicate that there are no previously <br />recorded cultural resources or survey reports in the project site. There are two <br />historic resources within a 0.25-mile radius of the project area. These <br />resources have been previously assessed and found not to qualify as <br />historical resource for the CRHR or NRHP. In addition, 14 survey reports are on <br />file with the NWIC for a 0.25-mile radius of the project area but none within <br />the project site itself. This suggests that while the project site itself has not <br />been previously surveyed, portions of the surrounding 0.25-mile radius has <br />been assessed for cultural resources. The record search results and analysis <br />can be found in Appendix D. <br />Survey conditions were documented using digital photographs and field <br />notes. During the survey, FCS Archaeologist Ryan Hallinan and Historian Ti <br />Ngo examined all areas of the exposed ground surface for prehistoric <br />artifacts (e.g., fire-affected rock, milling tools, flaked stone tools, toolmaking <br />debris, ceramics), soil discoloration and depressions that might indicate the <br />presence of a cultural midden, faunal and human osteological remains, and <br />features indicative of the former presence of structures or buildings (e.g., <br />postholes, standing exterior walls, foundations) or historic debris (e.g., glass, <br />metal, ceramics). <br />No indications of historic or prehistoric archaeological resources were found <br />over the course of the pedestrian survey. <br />Neither the NWIC record search results nor the pedestrian survey indicated <br />that there are historic or prehistoric archaeologic resources within the project <br />site. The project site is primarily vacant, except for two existing single-family <br />homes and two outbuildings, and none of the buildings on-site could be <br />evaluated as historical. However, while there are no known historic or <br />archaeological resources within or around the project site, a review of known
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.