Laserfiche WebLink
Environmental Impacts of the Proposed Changes to the Original Project <br /> <br />Addendum to the City of Pleasanton Downtown Specific Plan Final Environmental Impact Report 35 <br />Paleontological Resources <br />Impacts would be less than significant, similar to the Final EIR, and no significant new or <br />substantially increased paleontological resources impacts would occur compared to those identified <br />in the Final EIR. <br />Human Remains <br />Impacts would be less than significant, similar to the Final EIR, and no significant new or <br />substantially increased impacts to human remains would occur compared to those identified in the <br />Final EIR. <br />5.5 Energy and Greenhouse Gas Emissions <br />Impacts Identified in the Certified Final EIR <br />Greenhouse Gas Emissions <br />The Final EIR determined that development facilitated by the DSP would directly or indirectly <br />generate greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions that would have a significant impact on the environment, <br />and impacts would be significant and unavoidable. The Final EIR concludes that construction <br />emissions associated with buildout of the DSP would result in less than significant impacts as the air <br />district for the project region, BAAQMD, has not established thresholds for construction-related <br />GHG emissions. However, operation of development facilitated by the DSP would generate GHG <br />emissions associated with vehicle trips, natural gas and electricity use, waste and wastewater <br />generation, and landscaping activities. The DSP would comply with statewide GHG emissions <br />reduction goals and include mitigation to reduce GHG emissions, and the Final DSP EIR includes <br />Mitigation Measure GHG-1, which aims to reduce GHG emissions associated with new development. <br />However, development facilitated by the DSP would generate GHG emissions that would exceed the <br />efficiency threshold that would indicate “substantial progress” toward the emissions reduction <br />target of Executive Order S-3-05, and impacts would be significant and unavoidable. Similarly, <br />although the DSP would not conflict with the City’s Climate Action Plan, DSP would conflict with <br />state plans to reduce GHG emissions because it would result in GHG emissions that exceed the <br />efficiency threshold and impacts would be significant and unavoidable. <br />Energy <br />The Final EIR determined that development facilitated by the DSP would not result in wasteful, <br />inefficient, or unnecessary consumption of energy during project construction or operation. <br />Although the DSP would result in a net increase in energy consumption, the DSP includes several <br />policies related to encouraging alternative transit, supporting sustainable land use patterns, and <br />encouraging energy efficiency, and these policies would decrease the demand for energy on a per <br />capita and per service population basis. Impacts would be less than significant. The Final EIR also <br />determined that the DSP would not conflict with the California Building Code (CBC) Energy Efficiency <br />Standards, state vehicle GHG emissions reductions targets, or other applicable energy conservation <br />regulations, and impacts would be less than significant.