Laserfiche WebLink
City of Pleasanton <br />475 and 493 St. John Street Mixed-Use Project <br /> <br />52 <br />Groundborne Vibration <br />Operation of the project would not include substantial vibration sources. Thus, construction <br />activities would have the greatest potential to generate ground-borne vibration affecting nearby <br />receivers, especially during grading and paving of the project site. The greatest vibratory source <br />during construction would be a vibratory roller. Neither blasting nor pile driving would be required <br />for construction of the proposed project. Table 9 shows typical vibration levels for various pieces of <br />construction equipment used in the assessment of construction vibration (FTA 2018). <br />Table 9 Typical Vibration Levels for Construction Equipment <br />Equipment <br />PPV <br />(in/sec) at <br />25 Feet <br />Vibration <br />Damage <br />(VdB) at <br />25 Feet <br />Single family <br />Residence at 493 St. <br />John Street <br />65 feet <br />Multi-family <br />residential to the <br />west <br />110 feet <br />Commercial to the <br />east <br />110 feet <br /> PPV VdB PPV VdB PPV VdB PPV VdB <br />Vibratory Roller 0.21 94 0.050 75 0.023 82 0.023 75 <br />Large Bulldozer 0.089 87 0.021 68 0.010 75 0.010 68 <br />Loaded Trucks 0.076 86 0.018 67 0.008 74 0.008 67 <br />Small Bulldozer 0.003 58 0.001 39 0.000 46 0.000 39 <br />Sources: FTA 2018 <br />Project construction may require operation of vibratory equipment such as a vibratory roller within <br />approximately 65 feet of the existing on-site residential building to the southwest of the project site <br />along St. John Street from the center of construction activity. A vibratory roller would create <br />approximately 0.210 in/sec PPV and 94 VdB at 25 feet (FTA 2018). This would equal a vibration level <br />of 0.050 in/sec PPV and 82 VdB at a distance of 65 feet. This would be lower than the non- <br />engineered timber and masonry building threshold of 0.2 in/sec PPV and 94 VdB. Therefore, <br />temporary vibration impacts associated with the vibratory roller (and other potential equipment) <br />would be less than significant. <br />The project would not generate significant stationary sources of vibration, such as manufacturing or <br />heavy equipment operations. No operational vibration impact would occur. <br />Operational Noise <br />MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT <br />The primary on-site operational noise source from the project would be HVAC units for the <br />residential and commercial buildings. There would be three HVAC units on each of the proposed <br />commercial buildings within the project site. Specific planning data for the future HVAC systems are <br />not available at this stage of project design; however, this analysis assumes the use of a typical <br />HVAC system for commercial uses, which has a sound power level of 85 dBA that is equivalent to a <br />sound pressure level (SPL) of 77 dBA at 3 feet. The unit used in this analysis is a 16.7-ton Carrier <br />38AUD25 split system condenser (see Appendix F for manufacturer’s specifications). The project <br />would contain three HVAC units located in a rooftop mechanical area on each commercial building, <br />which has a combined noise level of 82 dBA. <br />In addition, each residential unit is assumed to have one ground-mounted HVAC unit on each of the <br />proposed residential buildings. For purposes of this analysis, a typical HVAC system for residential <br />uses (2.5-ton Carrier 24ABA4030) was analyzed, which has a sound power level of 73 dBA that is