My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
AGENDA FULL PACKET
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2020 - PRESENT
>
2024
>
10-23
>
AGENDA FULL PACKET
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/6/2024 11:08:57 AM
Creation date
11/6/2024 10:59:50 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
10/23/2024
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
531
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City of Pleasanton <br />475 and 493 St. John Street Mixed-Use Project <br /> <br />54 <br />Conclusion <br />Noise impacts during construction and operation would be less than significant, similar to the <br />impacts determined in the Final EIR. No significant new or substantially increased noise impacts <br />would occur compared to the original project. <br />5.11 Public Facilities and Recreation <br />Impacts Identified in the Certified Final EIR <br />The Final EIR determined that implementation of the DSP would not result in the need for new or <br />physically altered governmental facilities. The Final EIR reports that the Livermore-Pleasanton Fire <br />Department does not foresee a need for new or expanded facilities to accommodate planned <br />growth within the DSP area, and existing City policies and regulations would reduce the number of <br />calls for fire protection services by minimizing fire risks. Therefore, the DSP would not require new <br />or physically altered fire protection facilities. <br />The City adopted the Pleasanton Civic Center/Library Master Plan in 2016, which outlines the City’s <br />plan to construct a new civic center and library outside of the DSP area. The Final EIR reports that <br />the Pleasanton Police Department does not foresee the need for new or expanded police protection <br />facilities beyond those already planned to accommodate buildout of the DSP. Therefore, the DSP <br />would not require new or physically altered fire facilities. <br />The Final EIR estimated that the DSP would facilitate an increase of 95 school-aged children. <br />Because the Pleasanton Unified School District anticipated a student population increase at the time <br />the Final EIR was prepared, and because development in the DSP area would be required to pay a <br />School Facility Impact Fee, the Final EIR concluded that impacts to school facilities would be less <br />than significant, and the DSP would not require new or physically altered school facilities. <br />The DSP would include additional parkland, and the population increase facilitated by the DSP <br />would not cause the City to fall below its target of five acres of parkland per 1,000 residents. <br />Therefore, the DSP would not require new or physically altered park and recreational facilities. <br />Overall, the DSP would not result in the need for new or physically altered governmental or <br />recreational facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts in <br />order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times, or other performance objectives for fire <br />protection, police protection, schools, parks, or other public facilities. The Final EIR determined that <br />impacts would be less than significant. <br />Impacts of the Barone’s Project <br />As discussed in Section 4.9, Land Use, Population, and Housing, the proposed project would not <br />induce a substantial, unplanned increase in population or housing units within the DSP area. The <br />project’s anticipated increase in population and housing units was accounted for in the Final EIR for <br />the DSP. As discussed in the Final EIR and summarized above, the DSP would not require new or <br />physically altered governmental facilities or park and recreational facilities. Therefore, the project <br />would also not require new or physically altered governmental facilities or park and recreational <br />facilities. Impacts would be less than significant.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.