My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING AGENDA PACKET
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2024
>
121724
>
CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING AGENDA PACKET
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/11/2024 11:39:08 AM
Creation date
12/11/2024 11:13:09 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
12/17/2024
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
893
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Page 8 of 17 <br />Townhome/Duplex 1 per unit $500 $556.24 111% <br />Condominium 0.75 per unit $375 $417.18 111% <br />Apartment/Mobile <br />Home 0.66 per unit $330 $367.12 111% <br /> <br />Recommendations and Alternatives for Development Impact Fees, Commercial Linkage Fees <br />and Housing In-Lieu Fees <br />Table 7 summarizes each of the fees, and the maximum supportable fee levels, for the CFF, <br />TIF, Commercial Linkage and Inclusionary Housing In-Lieu Fee (Affordable Housing Fee). <br /> <br />Table 7: Summary of Development Impact Fees and Housing Fees – Maximum Amounts <br /> <br /> <br />Policy Considerations <br />As outlined above, the fee study indicates that increases to the majority of the City’s fees can <br />be justified based on the analysis. In some cases, the fee increases, if charged at the <br />maximum rates justified, could be substantial and, in the aggregate, could cause projects to <br />become financially infeasible, based on reasonable development expectations regarding <br />returns on investment. As such, it could negatively impact the City’s ability to see longer-term <br />returns of property tax and sales tax revenue that come with new investment or affect the <br />ability to meet other policy goals such as achieving Regional Housing Need Allocation (RHNA) <br />targets. <br /> <br />Alternatively, the City could choose to actively seek to support certain types of investments or <br />land uses, by setting fees somewhat lower, making the overall prospect of developing in <br />Page 214 of 893
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.