Laserfiche WebLink
Page 5 of 8 <br />manner. The Engineering Division will also establish the City’s Five-Year CIP in accordance <br />with the CIPPP results and will implement the approved CIP after the City Council approves <br />the recommended program. <br /> <br />CIP and the Prioritization Process <br />The CIPPP involves multiple phases: <br /> <br />Phase 1: Project Intake Process <br />This process begins with a call for project recommendations from various City departments <br />and stakeholders. The project intake process is open to all departments, including standing <br />City commissions and committees. The representative from each department/division will <br />develop project worksheets to clearly identify the scope of work and estimated budget and <br />complete a self-assessment of the recommended project. Projects may be derived from <br />adopted master plans (Bike & Pedestrian Master Plan, Parks Master Plan, Asset Management <br />Plan, Pavement Management Plan, etc.), strategic plans (ONE Pleasanton Strategic Plan, <br />Economic Development Strategic Plan, etc.), specific plans (Downtown Specific Plan, <br />Stoneridge Community Park Plan), and asset programs. <br /> <br />The projects list is not a comprehensive list of all the City’s needs, but a list of priorities put <br />forth by each department/division during the development of the Five-Year CIP. <br /> <br />Phase 2: Project Review and Ranking Process <br />The list of projects submitted by City departments/divisions will be reviewed by a balanced <br />internal/staff Prioritization Committee, which consists of multiple departments that are key <br />stakeholders in the CIP program. The Prioritization Committee will provide individual <br />prioritization scores to represent the best interest of the City’s overall needs and demands. <br />Once the committee reviews and scores all the submitted projects according to the six <br />categories of the CIPPP prioritization method, the projects will be ranked from the highest to <br />the lowest. <br /> <br />Phase 3: Recommendation of the Final Ranked Prioritization CIP List <br />The prioritized list is compiled by the Public Works Engineering Division, reviewed by the <br />Director of Public Works for process compliance, and checked before being submitted to the <br />City Manager for review and approval of the initial ranked and prioritized project list. <br /> <br />Phase 4: Resource Analysis and Loading <br />The City Manager's reviewed list is then evaluated by the Public Works Engineering Division <br />and the Finance Department to identify eligible funding sources, available funding, available <br />grants, staff resources, and professional services resources to implement the prioritized <br />project list. Following this, the Public Works Engineering Division shall recommend a final list <br />of funded and unfunded CIP projects to be included in the Five-Year CIP to the Director of <br />Public Works and the City Manager for approval before submitting it to City Council review. <br />This review and approval aim to ensure the Five-Year CIP’s overall alignment with the City’s <br />strategic goals and objectives. <br /> <br />The cut-off line between funded and unfunded projects is based on the available budget <br />allocated for the City’s capital improvement program every year. Due to the nature of <br />restricted and non-restricted funds, the size of projects, and their respective resource needs, <br />some projects below the cut-off line may move up the ranked and prioritized projects list. Any <br />Page 304 of 893