My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2025
>
031825 REGULAR
>
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/13/2025 2:43:59 PM
Creation date
3/18/2025 2:36:11 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
3/18/2025
EXPIRATION DATE
3/18/2045
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
147
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
November 8, 2024 <br />Page 27 <br /> <br />7357-013acp <br /> printed on recycled paper <br />propose concurrent and potentially incompatible long-term uses on parcel APN 946- <br />4634-2 which may require the County to consider new project alternatives that were <br />not identified in the Arroyo Lago NOP. The impacts of the two projects must be <br />analyzed in the same EIR. At a minimum, the EIR must analyze and mitigate all <br />reasonably foreseeable direct, indirect, and cumulative effects of the two projects <br />the County identified as potentially significant, including: <br /> <br />Aesthetics, Air Quality, Biological Resources, Cultural Resources, Energy, <br />Geology and Soils, Greenhouse Gas Emissions, Hazards and Hazardous <br />Materials, Hydrology and Water Quality, Land Use and Planning, Mineral <br />Resources, Noise, Population and Housing, Public Services, Recreation, <br />Transportation, Tribal Cultural Resources, Utilities and Service Systems, <br />and Wildfire.138 <br /> <br />The County must also analyze and mitigate any additional significant <br />impacts which are identified during preparation of the EIR. Examples of two <br />impact areas identified by responsible agencies during the NOP comment period are <br />discussed below which require specific analysis in the EIR. <br /> <br />1. Water Supply <br /> <br />The Arroyo Lago and Senior East County Lakes projects may have significant <br />impacts on water supply, both individually and cumulatively, which must be <br />analyzed in a water supply assessment (“WSA”) that is circulated for public review <br />with the Draft EIR. <br /> <br />The CEQA Guidelines and State Water Code require a WSA to be prepared <br />for all “water-demand projects,” which includes, inter alia, residential developments <br />of more than 500 dwelling units, a project that would demand an amount of water <br />equivalent to, or greater than, the amount of water required by a 500 dwelling unit <br />project, proposed residential or mixed use projects that would account for an <br />increase of 10 percent or more in the number of a public water system's existing <br />service connections for public water systems with fewer than 5,000 service <br />connections.139 At 569 units, the Senior East County Lakes Project alone exceeds <br />the 500-unit threshold requiring a WSA. Both the Senior East County Lakes and <br />Arroyo Lago projects may individually exceed the 10 percent threshold for <br />increasing water connections, and when considered together (763 units), the <br />projects clearly exceed thresholds requiring a WSA. Under CEQA and the Water <br /> <br />138 NOP, p. 11. <br />139 14 Cal. Code Regs. § 15155(a); Water Code § 10910.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.