DIAMETER SERVICES USA INC - Laserfiche WebLink

City of Pleasanton Consulting Services - AMI Feasibility Study 12 | P a g e Sample Risk Register Deliverables/Tasks: • Risk management workshop • Risk register development 1.2.14. Design – AMI Feasibility Study Findings and Recommendations Summary Report Approach: Diameter will develop a Final Report which provides documentation of the work conducted specific to the following topics and provide summarizes for: • Executive Summary • Organizational and Project Goals • Problem Definition Summary and Mitigation Opportunities • Business Drivers Summary • Financial Summary • Recommendations Deliverables/Tasks: • Findings and Recommendations Summary Report 1.2.15. Overview of AMI Systems and Metrology (Technology Educational Session) (Optional) Approach: Diameter Services’ core competency is water meters and related AMI technologies and services. Diameter Services is both knowledgeable and up to date on the available technologies, and most importantly we remain vendor agnostic. Our technology review workshop will be conducted by our subject matter experts and consist of two components: AMI Technology and Water Meter Technology. The core purpose of this deliverable will be to provide an overview of the AMI and metering technologies that would be best suited for the City. Diameter will provide a workshop to ensure all participants have the same base level of knowledge of the AMI and metering technologies as well as an understanding of the benefits/drawbacks of each. Diameter provides a generic look at the various technologies, and we try to avoid manufacturer-specific features and functionalities. We also look to identify technology opportunities that are specific to your City. This session will be conducted by subject matter experts who will have a comprehensive understanding specific to water. These discussions will also include an evaluation of the City’s service area to determine the viability of constructing an AMI system. Sample workshop topics include: Current Status Severi ty of Occurr ence Likeliho od of Occurre nce Risk Matrix Risk Description Phase Risk Owner Project Impact Risk Response Strategy Response Strategy Contingency Plan Open Low Low Green Project Buy In Lack of internal stakeholder buy-in Procurement Risk Owner? Lack of project team and internal stakeholder buy-in could lead to project failure. - Leadership should demonstrate a strong understanding of project goals and develop an “elevator pitch” to show project support. - Internal project staff should be fully educated on the technical components of an AMI system and undergo thorough training prior to the Go-Live date Open Low Low Green Customer Compliance Customer refusing to comply with program.Installation Risk Owner? The biggest risk is related to large commercial properties not providing adequate time to allow for a shut down. CGS does not see this as a big risk.Acceptance Rely on the existing compliance program in dealing with any customers who do not allow a installation to occur. On residential customer the work will proceed (in line with a defined process). Open Medium High Red Funding Project funding is dependent on Approval of council and be inline with our Project estimate Procurement Risk Owner? Insufficient project funding could lead to project delays or work stoppage. Grid modernization is capital intensive and faces problems imposed by utilities’ constrained balance sheets. Open High High Red Data Collector Locations Installation Risk Owner? If locations cannot be secured or are not able to be deployed in the area where the Vendor requires could result in an incomplete network and impact system performance, Contingency It appears there are not enough CGS locations to allow an acceptable number of AMI vendors to perform a realistic propogation study. Need to reach out through the colloboration tasks to get some buy in. Docusign Envelope ID: A02F5956-6338-44A0-AD2F-17F98C437CB8