Laserfiche WebLink
City of Pleasanton—Villages at the Quarry Project <br />15183 Consistency Checklist Consistency Checklist <br /> <br /> <br /> 117 <br />disposal, implementation of approved local plans, control of construction <br />sediment and erosion control measures, and identification of maintenance <br />responsibilities, as well as non-stormwater management controls. <br />Lastly, per General Plan Program 2.2, the proposed project would be <br />required to implement all erosion control measures recommended in the <br />Geotechnical Investigation prepared for the proposed project, including <br />those for surface and subsurface drainage (Appendix E). <br />Therefore, development as proposed would not result in any environmental <br />effects that are peculiar to the proposed project. The proposed project <br />would not result in a new or more severe adverse impact that was not <br />previously identified in the Housing Element Update FEIR. <br />c) Unstable Geologic Location <br />Would the project: Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would <br />become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in <br />on- or off-site landsliding, lateral spreading, subsidence, <br />liquefaction, or collapse? <br />Summary of Housing Element Update FEIR <br />The Housing Element Update FEIR indicated that unstable geologic units or <br />soils, including geologic hazards, such as subsidence or collapse, are present. <br />As such, development consistent with the Housing Element Update could <br />occur within areas containing unstable geologic units or be located on soils <br />that are unstable or could become unstable from such development. <br />The Housing Element Update FEIR concluded that compliance with the CBC, <br />applicable Municipal Code requirements, as well as goals, policies, and <br />programs included as part of the General Plan would ensure that potential <br />impacts associated with development on unstable geologic units or unstable <br />soils would be less than significant. <br />Proposed Project Analysis and Conclusion <br />As discussed above, the proposed project would be required to implement <br />General Plan Public Safety Element Goal 1, Policy 2, and Goal 2, Policy 5 to <br />mitigate and minimize the risk of soil erosion and its effects. Furthermore, the <br />project site is considered an area with low liquefaction and landslide <br />potential. The Geotechnical Report also concluded that the potential for