Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Nelson Fialho/Mr. David Haglund Page 10 <br />Preliminary Issues Assessment of Potential Colocation of Maintenance Facilities <br />16.Who will take responsibility for implementation of the next steps in the process and for <br />future project management? <br />Conducting the types of studies needed to answer the questions that have surfaced as part <br />of this preliminary assessment will take time on the part of City and District staff. <br />Additionally, as the process moves through future phases, project management will be <br />needed by both parties to address all of the issues. A schedule and implementation plan will <br />be needed as part of the assessment identifying the timing required, various tasks, and the <br />responsible City and/or District staff member. <br />Part 2: Future Comprehensive Feasibility Study <br />If the City and District determine that they wish to further analyze the co-location concept or <br />other alternatives, Management Partners recommends a comprehensive feasibility analysis of <br />options be conducted. A feasibility study would determine what site alternative would be most <br />suitable, whether the project is technically feasible, what the specific costs and benefits for the <br />City and PUSD would be, and the steps and timing of implementation. It would also provide <br />policy makers and executive managers with information to decide whether the project provides <br />sufficient operational and financial benefits to meet policy and community interests, and <br />therefore warrants a decision to move forward. <br />Policy and Operational Parameters <br />A first step before proceeding with a comprehensive feasibility study would be to jointly <br />develop policy and operational parameters or guidelines under which such a project might be <br />considered. Examples of issues to be addressed up front include the following. <br />1.Operational functions which should be included and those that should not. <br />2.Acceptable land use scenarios or alternatives. <br />3.The degree to which shared services are acceptable and what those might be. <br />4.Acceptable cost impacts. <br />5.Future growth and competing public policies that may present significant obstacles. <br />Elements of a Feasibility Study <br />A feasibility study for the co-location project would include at the following, at a minimum: <br />1.Location options – Define the location options to be studied, such as: <br />a.Specified PUSD functions (as agreed to by the parties) on the OSC site; <br />b.Acquire land adjacent to OSC and relocate specified PUSD functions in close <br />proximity to City operations; and, <br />c.Acquire land across from OSC and relocate specified PUSD functions in close <br />proximity to City operations. <br />2.Operational requirements – Conduct a thorough analysis of current operational <br />requirements of the City and PUSD, as well as projected future needs to determine land <br />and space requirements. <br />3.Reconfiguration options to maximize use and operations of existing OSC – Analyze <br />existing space and uses at OSC for potential reconfiguration, repurposing or new