My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA PACKET
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2025
>
052025 REGULAR
>
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA PACKET
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/14/2025 10:27:20 AM
Creation date
5/14/2025 10:18:21 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
5/20/2025
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
682
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Page 2 of 5 <br /> <br />RECOMMENDATION <br />Adopt a resolution affirming the City’s commitment to take steps toward achieving compliance <br />with the Metropolitan Transportation Commission’s (MTC's) Transit-Oriented Communities <br />(TOC) Policy as a condition for MTC to allocate regional discretionary funding under the TOC <br />Planning and Implementation Grants Program. <br /> <br />BACKGROUND <br />The requested resolution of local support (Attachment 1) is required for the City to receive a <br />requested $300,000 in grant funds from MTC-ABAG, which will fund work to develop and <br />implement strategies for parking management and station access around the east <br />Dublin/Pleasanton BART Station. As outlined below, these strategies are supportive of efforts <br />toward compliance with the MTC-ABAG’s Transit-Oriented Communities (TOC) Policy, which <br />benefits eligibility for local and regional planning, infrastructure and transportation funding <br />(OBAG 4 and Regional Measure 3), and to plan for and implement redevelopment of the BART <br />station property, consistent with the 6th Cycle Housing Element. <br /> <br />TOC Policy and Relationship to Local Projects and Plans <br />MTC-ABAG’s TOC policy, adopted in 2022, derives from its recent regional land use and <br />transportation plan, known as Plan Bay Area 2050 (PBA 2050). The policy is intended to <br />support the region’s transit investments and broader environmental, sustainable development, <br />housing, and transportation objectives by increasing housing and employment opportunities <br />near transit. As a regional agency, MTC-ABAG does not have local land use authority over its <br />member jurisdictions, but can incentivize local jurisdictions to meet its regional policy <br />objectives through the discretionary regional transportation and other funding it controls. <br /> <br />One Bay Area Grant (OBAG) Program <br />The most significant program to be tied to future TOC Policy compliance is the One Bay Area <br />Grant (OBAG) program. The program, which has existed since 2012, supports the <br />implementation of Plan Bay Area by directing funding to regional priority programs: prioritizing <br />funding for transit adjacent areas, rewarding housing production, and providing a flexible <br />funding program to support a broad range of transportation projects. As a practical matter, the <br />OBAG program is administered by the various Bay Area counties’ transportation agencies, in <br />Alameda County, Alameda CTC. <br /> <br />The OBAG program is currently in its third round of funding (OBAG 3). Starting in 2026, with <br />OBAG 4, the program will be re-oriented to align with the TOC policy, with eligibility for <br />discretionary funding and competitive grants relying on compliance with the adopted TOC <br />Policy. OBAG 3 provided a total of $375 million over its four-year cycle, funding a range of <br />projects throughout the region. <br /> <br />In the past, the City has not aggressively pursued competitive OBAG grant funding, but did <br />receive both OBAG 1 ($832,000) and OBAG 2 ($1,095,000) funding for roadway resurfacing <br />projects. The City did not have an allocation of OBAG 3 funds as part of Alameda CTC’s <br />combined call for projects, and instead funded these projects through Measure BB, since they <br />were better matched with that funding source. <br /> <br />Although local jurisdictions’ compliance with the TOC policy with respect to OBAG 4 funding <br />Page 142 of 682
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.