My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
RES 2025036
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
RESOLUTIONS
>
2020-present
>
2025
>
RES 2025036
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/8/2025 5:12:14 PM
Creation date
7/8/2025 5:09:24 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
RESOLUTIONS
DOCUMENT DATE
6/17/2025
DESTRUCT DATE
PERMANENT
DOCUMENT NO
RES 2025-036
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
56
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Element 8 – System Evaluation, Capacity Assurance, and Capital Improvements <br />City of Pleasanton Sewer System Management Plan, July 2025 30 <br />(e.g., proximity to storm drains or Waters of the State), location (road type), and community <br />impact (proximity to commercial areas and public facilities). A weighting system was applied <br />to each of the LOF and COF factors to determine an overall risk score and risk category (very <br />low, low, medium, or high), reflecting its priority. Based on the risk assessment results, <br />gravity sewers were identified for continued preventive maintenance (pipes without major <br />defects) or R&R. Pipes with R&R recommendations of medium or high-risk ratings were <br />identified for inclusion in the City’s long-term CIP. <br />The City plans to expand the condition assessment evaluation to the remaining sewer pipes <br />that have been inspected/coded since June 2024 (~103,000 linear feet inspected and coded <br />and ~110,000 linear feet inspected and awaiting coding). Moving forward, the City plans to <br />maintain an overall 7-year inspection frequency. The City will also consider making future <br />refinements to COF criteria to more specifically identify sewers in other environmentally <br />sensitive areas (e.g., steep terrain, high groundwater areas, areas near creeks, etc.) or areas <br />that may be more vulnerable to the impacts of climate change. As part of the long-term CIP’s <br />2-year review and 6-year update process, the City will review its CCTV inspection program to <br />incorporate up-to-date information. <br />8.2.2: Large Diameter Sewers, Siphons, and Manholes <br />Inspection of the City’s large diameter sewers, siphons, and manholes were not performed or <br />conditions evaluated as part of the City’s current CIP. Budget for these inspections and <br />condition assessments will be included in the City’s long-term CIP currently under <br />development. Results of the inspections will be evaluated, and recommended improvements <br />included in future 2-year reviews and 6-year updates of the long-term CIP. <br />8.2.3: Lift Stations <br />As discussed in Section 4, lift stations are regularly inspected by operators utilizing the City’s <br />lift station inspection forms. The lift stations also undergo an engineering assessment as part <br />of the long-term CIP process. The last engineering assessment was completed in January 2025 <br />by Woodard & Curran. The evaluation process included an initial review of record drawings <br />and miscellaneous documents followed by onsite inspections and assessments of each <br />station’s configuration, process condition, mechanical condition, observed structural <br />condition, safety, operations and maintenance insight, electrical, and overall long-term <br />reliability. In addition, Woodard & Curran coordinated with City staff for input on which lift <br />stations present the highest risk in terms of day-to-day operations. The assessment also <br />incorporated the findings and recommendations of a separate generator study completed by <br />TJC and Associates. <br />During the inspection of each lift station, issues were highlighted that may warrant additional <br />attention or future improvements. For each facility, these identified issues were given <br />numerical criticality (1 = Fair, 2 = Poor, 3 = Crucial) and categorized into six (6) groups: <br />Process, Mechanical, Electrical, Structural, Site, and Health & Safety. Recommended lift
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.