Laserfiche WebLink
Page 7 of 9 <br />maximum shift or one per 300 square feet, unless reduced under state law for transit-oriented <br />sites. <br /> <br />Service Equipment and Emissions <br />New rules ensure building equipment is screened and placed to reduce visual impacts. <br />Existing regulations prohibiting hazardous emissions would be updated to require compliance <br />with all applicable Federal, State, and BAAQMD standards. <br /> <br />Evolution of PMC Amendments <br />While staff supports the PMC Amendments recommended for approval by the Planning <br />Commission (Attachment 1, Exhibit A), staff originally proposed a broader set of amendments <br />aimed at expanding the ability for IBB support services and amenity-type uses—specifically <br />personal services and hotels/motels—to locate in more zoning districts that are in closer <br />proximity to areas where IBBs would likely locate. This would have been achieved by allowing <br />these uses either by right (permitted) or with a Minor Conditional Use Permit (MCUP) reviewed <br />at the Zoning Administrator level in districts where they are not currently permitted. <br /> <br />As outlined in the July 23, 2025, Planning Commission staff report (Attachment 2), staff <br />ultimately concurred with the Planning Commission’s view that hotels and motels are already <br />permitted in locations likely to be near IBBs and therefore did not pursue that recommendation <br />further. Similarly, personal services are already allowed in several districts in proximity to likely <br />IBB locations. As a result, staff limited its final recommendation to allowing personal services <br />only when located within the same site as an IBB. <br /> <br />Other Implementing Actions to Support IBBs <br />Staff notes that the proposed zoning updates will help remove key regulatory barriers and <br />make it easier to attract IBBs to Pleasanton. However, the growth of IBBs will still be limited by <br />the General Plan’s current Floor Area Ratio (FAR) cap of 0.5 in industrial areas. To address <br />this, staff recommends a two-step approach: first, move forward with the proposed PMC <br />Amendments limits. This second step would require more time and could involve <br />environmental review under CEQA, likely occurring within the next 12 to 24 months. <br /> <br />In addition, while the current PMC Amendments make targeted improvements, staff see (and <br />are planning for) a broader need to update other sections of the PMC—particularly the Design <br />Review chapter—to better support economic development, streamline processes, and reduce <br />unnecessary administrative burdens. <br /> <br />General Plan Consistency <br />As discussed in detail in the July 23, 2025, Planning Commission Agenda Report (Attachment <br />2), the proposed PMC Amendments to support IBBs are consistent with the goals and policies <br />of the City’s General Plan. The General Plan promotes sustainable economic growth, <br />diversification of the local economy, and advancement in technology and education— <br />objectives directly supported by encouraging IBBs. <br /> <br />The amendments align with land use designations such as General and Limited Industrial (I-P <br />and I-G zones), where IBBs would be a compatible and appropriate subcategory. They are <br />also consistent with the intent of other designations, such as Retail/Highway/Service <br />Commercial, Business and Professional Office, and Business Park areas, given that IBBs are <br />low-impact, clean commercial uses. <br />Page 51 of 674