My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA PACKET
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2025
>
081925 REGULAR
>
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA PACKET
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/12/2025 3:52:54 PM
Creation date
8/12/2025 3:47:35 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
8/19/2025
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
674
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
P25-0192, Industrial Zoning Text Amendments Planning Commission <br />11 of 14 <br />shall be required through the manipulation of building mass, detailing of the <br />building façade(s), and landscape planting to the satisfaction of the zoning <br />administrator. <br />f. For buildings over 40 feet in height that are adjacent to or within proximity to <br />existing residential and/or other similar sensitive receptor uses, all levels <br />beyond the second level on the sides of the building facing or adjacent to the <br />existing residential and/or other similar sensitive receptor uses shall be <br />setback from the wall planes of the lower levels to the satisfaction of the <br />zoning administrator. <br /> <br />As an alternative, should the Planning Commission find the proposed height thresholds <br />are generally appropriate but may be unsuitable in certain contexts—and the proposed <br />geographic boundaries do not fully address potential concerns—the Planning <br />Commission could consider an additional restriction. Specifically, the Commission may <br />elect to impose a supplemental standard stating no new IBB building may exceed 40 <br />feet in height if it is located adjacent to an existing residential zone, existing residential <br />development, or other sensitive receptor. For the purposes of this restriction, "adjacent" <br />would be defined as sharing a property line or being separated only by a local or <br />collector street (excluding arterials). <br /> <br />• Off-Street Parking Facilities: Section 18.88.030 would be amended to read: Unless <br />subject to more limited parking requirements established by State law or local policies <br />and regulations with respect to sites within specified distance of major transit stops such <br />as BART, manufacturing plants and other industrial uses, innovation-based businesses, <br />warehouses, storage buildings, and storage facilities combined with commercial or <br />industrial uses—one space for each employee on the maximum shift, or one space for <br />each 300 square feet of gross floor area. <br /> <br />• Service Equipment: Equipment required for building services, such as transformers, <br />emergency generators, gas meters, and similar components, would be carefully located <br />to minimize visual impact from public open spaces and primary pedestrian and vehicular <br />routes. Screening by means of structured elements or effective use of landscape <br />materials to the extent feasible, when equipment exceeds three feet in height, would be <br />required. <br /> <br />• Emissions & Other Impacts: Section 18.48.060 currently prohibits any business with <br />emissions dangerous to human or animal health. This section would be replaced with a <br />general requirement that any industrial business with potentially dangerous emissions <br />must be regulated in compliance with all applicable Federal, State, and Bay Area Air <br />Quality Management District (BAAQMD) regulations. Criteria regarding odor, vibration, <br />noise, and other similar potential negative impacts are already addressed in Chapter <br />18.48. <br /> <br />Other Implementing Actions to Support IBBs <br />Staff notes the proposed Zoning updates mentioned above will remove major regulatory <br />barriers and facilitate the attraction of IBBs to Pleasanton. However, the scale of IBB <br />development would continue to be severely limited by the General Plan’s existing FAR limits, <br />which set a maximum FAR of 0.5 in Industrial Districts. Revision to the General Plan to modify <br />the FAR limit is a more substantial policy discussion, and staff is proposing a two-step process <br />Page 76 of 674
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.