My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
RES 2025037-1
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
RESOLUTIONS
>
2020-present
>
2025
>
RES 2025037-1
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/3/2025 11:25:33 AM
Creation date
10/3/2025 11:23:30 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
RESOLUTIONS
DOCUMENT DATE
7/15/2025
DESTRUCT DATE
PERMANENT
DOCUMENT NO
RESO 2025-037-1
Document Relationships
BAY AREA RAPID TRANSIT (BART) MOU 25-0725
(Message)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\CONTRACTS\B
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
consultant team will provide any available information required for the MOU and support the <br /> City in reviewing the MOU. <br /> Deliverable: <br /> 2.1 Review of the TOD Planning Agreement with BART. <br /> Task 3: Existing conditions, opportunities,and constraints <br /> A. Existing Physical Site Conditions: Conduct an analysis of the existing conditions on the <br /> site including but not limited to title reports, aerial, geotechnical analysis, flood zone <br /> review, mapping existing utilities (water, power, sewer, and high-speed internet). <br /> B. Constraints Evaluation: Provide a summary report inclusive of existing conditions and <br /> constraints, using information in the property's title report, property survey, a description <br /> of BART's infrastructure, and a Basis of Design Criteria memo to be provided by BART <br /> that summarizes known requirements and constraints. This report should include an <br /> assessment of grading, topography. drainage and stormwater requirements for future <br /> development while taking into consideration future flood conditions as identified on <br /> FEMA flood maps. The summary report should also include the findings of the technical <br /> analysis for the Planning Commission and City Council to review and provide direction <br /> on project alternatives. To ensure a comprehensive understanding of constraints. the <br /> consultant will engage with city departments, including Fire. Police, Public Works to <br /> capture any additional requirements. <br /> C. Station Access and Parking Management Strategy: Conduct a site specific station access <br /> and parking demand management study to evaluate the need for and opportunities to <br /> accommodate commuter parking on-site and alternative parking strategies, as well as to <br /> accommodate multi-modal circulation within the site following redevelopment and <br /> enable efficient BART operations. Informed by findings from Task 3B and available <br /> parking utilization and access data, identify multimodal circulation, parking, traffic <br /> demand management, and Station Management approaches consistent with BART TOD <br /> policies. Consider patrons arriving from alternative modes of transportation via LAVTA <br /> transport or via bicycle on the Iron Horse Trail and the new Alameda County Dublin <br /> garage adjacent to the existing BART garage on the Dublin side. <br /> D. Market Analysis: Evaluate demand under a variety of potential future scenarios for <br /> residential, commercial. and institutional floorspace. For commercial and institutional <br /> uses with potential viability, estimate the amount of floorspace and the building <br /> configuration of a typical project, and highlight any unique access or other issues <br /> affecting site design. For institutional uses, identify potential long-term lessees of <br /> floorspace built as part of the redevelopment (e.g. health care, education, government). <br /> Discuss, whether the BART site should anticipate development other than Residential <br /> with a small amount of retail. <br /> Page 18 of 21 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.