My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
ITEM 5 EXHIBITS A-H
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2020 - PRESENT
>
2025
>
11-12
>
ITEM 5 EXHIBITS A-H
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/7/2025 5:53:56 PM
Creation date
11/7/2025 5:11:43 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
11/12/2025
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
1327
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />4400 Black Avenue Redevelopment – Transportation Assessment January 8, 2025 <br />16 <br /> <br />Table illustrates the VMT per resident values for the Project when compared to the threshold value <br />for the Alameda County. <br />Table 5: VMT/Capita Values from ACTC Model <br />TAZ <br />Base Year <br />VMT per <br />Resident <br />County Average <br />VMT per <br />Resident <br />Significance <br />Threshold <br />(15% Below City <br />Average) <br />Base Year plus Project <br />VMT per <br />Resident <br />Significant? <br />(Yes/No) <br />1135 0* 17.6 14.96 20.08 Yes <br />*There are no residents currently in this TAZ for the base year no project condition. <br />Since there are no residents coded in the TAZ in the base year (only commercial land uses), the base <br />year VMT/Capita value for TAZ #1135 is defined as zero. Adding the Project raises the VMT per resident <br />value from 17.6 to 20.08. Since 20.08 is higher than the threshold VMT/Capita value of 14.96, TJKM <br />finds the project to have a significant and unavoidable with mitigation impact on VMT. <br />Note, this finding is consistent with the findings in the City’s Housing Element. <br />The City of Pleasanton Housing Element Update includes Mitigation Measure (MM) TRANS-2 to reduce <br />VMT. MM TRANS-2 requires individual housing project development proposals that do not screen out <br />from a VMT impact analysis to provide a quantitative VMT analysis using the methodology used for <br />the Draft Program Housing Element EIR and, if results indicate the VMT associated with the individual <br />housing project would be above the threshold, that project would be required to include VMT <br />reduction measures. A project-specific VMT evaluation consistent with this criterion is presented in <br />Table 4 and Table 5. <br />Following the Housing Element EIR methodology, a detailed assessment of project VMT was evaluated <br />using the Alameda CTC VMT Reduction Calculator Tool. As shown in the Project site plan in <br />Attachment 4, the project will incorporate a TDM strategy by providing bicycle parking for up to 28 <br />bicycles onsite, including 14 bicycle racks. <br />Consistent with the evaluation using Alameda CTC VMT Reduction Calculator Tool (included in <br />Attachment 5), bicycle parking is a TDM measure strategy that would reduce VMT by 0.1%. Thus, <br />through the implementation of the planned TDM strategy, the Project’s total VMT would be reduced <br />from 20.08 to 19.98 VMT, which would still exceed the 14.96 VMT threshold for significance. Therefore, <br />the project would still have a significant adverse transportation impact from a VMT perspective under <br />CEQA criteria.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.